When teaching future studies I have called on social and political figures not to retain an industrial society mindset by thinking that government finances will never fail.
Following Iceland’s bankruptcy, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger recently declared a fiscal state of emergency as that state teeters on the brink. This is a warning we should all heed.
A more worrying problem is that Taiwan’s demographic structure is being gradually transformed from the pyramid shape of agrarian societies to the shape of an upside-down pyramid.
In other words, the taxpaying working population is shrinking as the proportion of the population receiving pensions or welfare benefits is growing. In 2004, retirement expenditure reached NT$210 billion (US$6.4 billion), the same as the amount of the government’s revenue from individual income tax that year. The numbers have continued to rise since then and set new records.
With the demographic structure retaining the shape of an upside-down pyramid, the nation’s fiscal deficit will inevitably increase. The government cannot continue to solve this problem by increasing budget spending, as industrial societies might, because the future working population won’t be able to pay enough taxes to sustain national expenses.
The pension system did not develop until after the industrial revolution. Labor relations and related social problems started to appear because the majority of people came to be employed by an enterprise or organization. To protect workers after retirement, governments created legislation regulating welfare and pension systems.
The Council for Economic Planning and Development has said that the decline in the nation’s population at the current rate will result in a population of 8 million people 100 years from now. As population distribution turns into an upside-down pyramid, many welfare and insurance structures are bound to collapse. This is evidenced by a huge deficit in labor insurance payments and the National Health Insurance’s debt of NT$51.1 billion.
In addition, the National Pension System was only launched in October last year, but the Ministry of Interior already expects a deficit of NT$8 billion next year and of more than NT$20 billion the following year. The government will not be able to sustain these welfare programs in their current form.
We need a new approach to career and life planning. The average lifespan in Taiwan is 78 years, while the average retirement age between 2001 and 2007 was 55. This means that people on average need to prepare funds for 23 years of retirement. If labor and health insurance are no longer guaranteed, post-retirement living and medical expenses will become a heavy burden. Thus, as I argue in my book Future Studies, we should prepare for this time our entire lives and avoid being a burden to our children.
How do we achieve this? Simple math: Save enough money to support yourself until death. As life expectancy expands, it will be necessary to postpone retirement and develop multiple areas of expertise. Postponement of retirement is an inevitable trend, and it can be done in one of two ways: by staying on at one’s job or by changing jobs. Regardless, the message is to keep working — to have a lifetime job, as it were. This is what is meant by the new concept of “silver-collar worker.”
But this does not mean that jobs will be there just because people want them. For most to find a job, it will be necessary to develop the expertise that a changing society needs. Whether we like it or not, the age of lifetime work has quietly arrived.
Chuang Chi-ming is a professor in the Department of Educational Management at National Taipei University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with