Since assuming office, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration have aggressively promoted China-leaning economic policies, including direct transport links, Chinese tourism and Chinese investment in the stock and real estate markets.
With opportunism on the rise and under an economic shadow, the Taiwanese public is gradually becoming dependent on China, if not addicted, and may become subject to manipulation by the Chinese government.
The reason the Ma administration has managed to deceive a number of people with its policies is that it is has been calling for a separation of politics and economics, and has claimed that economic exchanges between Taiwan and China do not have to be political.
The government has gone so far as to say that controversial issues can be put aside, and that this means the public would not have to worry that Taiwan might lose its sovereignty, national identity and autonomy in the process.
It is a discourse that is both deceitful and dangerous.
Ma’s rhetoric of separating politics from economics has two pillars.
First, China’s economic power is so strong that it will not only help Taiwan ride out the financial crisis, but also bring the nation prosperity.
Second, China is a philanthropic state that asks for nothing in return; its economic activities relating to Taiwan are constructive and have no political connotations.
These presumptions are demonstrably wrong. For this reason, it is surprising that the Ma administration has managed to avoid stronger public dissatisfaction for failing to boost the economy since taking office more than a year ago.
On the other hand, the public has little choice but to sit on the driftwood of Ma’s policies through a once-in-a-century financial storm even if they know that it is a charade.
China has progressed to a certain extent after 30 years of reform, but its economic power has an aura only because its population accounts for one-fifth of humanity.
Even if average income per capita in China does not sit among the world’s well-to-do, this number multiplied by 1.3 billion is formidable and seductive.
When the term “BRIC” — Brazil, Russia, India and China — was coined to cover the economic entities with the most potential for development, the acronym was accompanied by a new bout of received wisdom that China’s GDP would soon surpass Germany’s and Japan’s to become the second-largest in the world.
Others chimed in by saying that China would overtake the US within 20 years.
This discourse deliberately ignored the huge discrepancy between national populations and intentionally highlighted comparisons that were calculated using different standards. China’s average income per capita is one-twentieth of the US’ and one-tenth of Taiwan’s. How could Taiwan pin its hopes on a country with a national income that in per capita terms is extraordinarily small?
Second, China’s economic infiltration of Taiwan has never been free of political motivations and intentions. Although China often avoids talking about politics in the context of Taiwan, it always employs political strategy.
Examples of this are direct transport links and the opening up of Taiwan to Chinese tourism.
In one year, Taiwanese tourist arrivals in China reached 4 million, while only around 300,000 Chinese visited Taiwan. The government, however, was reluctant to use this as leverage and demand that China respect Taiwan’s sovereignty and national identity and engage with it on an equal footing. Instead, China did so — requesting that Taiwan open up the Taiwan Strait median line.
In another example, Taiwanese tourists in China would never dare ask Chinese hotels or restaurants to display the Republic of China’s national flag, yet some stores in Taiwan’s more scenic locations have displayed the flag of the People’s Republic of China and have posted signs in simplified Chinese characters to pander to these 300,000 tourists.
Taiwan is suffering from the global financial crisis and has still sent millions of tourists to China. Yet a few hundred thousand Chinese tourists in Taiwan shamelessly state to reporters that they have come to “save” the local economy.
This imbalance means that as Taiwan exports its hard-earned money, Chinese in Taiwan barely make inroads into Taiwan’s tourism pie.
Yet the government still regards Chinese tourism as a panacea for the economy.
Not only is this government fatuous and incompetent, its conduct is also humiliating and compromises the nation’s sovereignty.
From the beginning, China’s policies on Taiwan have been political and economic. During a visit to the US last month, the director of China’s Taiwan Affairs Office, Wang Yi (王毅), said that the point of cross-strait relations was not to separate economic and political issues but to determine the correct priorities.
In other words, in the end, China wants to achieve political goals. If Beijing temporarily avoids discussing political issues, this is a strategy designed to protect its trump card and to avoid frightening ordinary Taiwanese.
As soon as Taiwan leans toward China to the extent that most believe Taiwan cannot live without its neighbor, China will begin political negotiations and the whole sordid agenda will become apparent.
By that time, it will be too late for regret.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS