South Korean President Lee Myung-bak’s latest gesture, which keeps one of his campaign promises, puts President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in a bad light.
On Monday, Lee announced that he would donate 33.1 billion won (US$26 million) — more than 80 percent of his total personal wealth — to a scholarship foundation to help “those who really need it.” Prior to this latest donation, in March last year — a month after taking office — Lee donated the entire salary for his five-year presidency to help low-income households amid the global economic downturn.
In contrast, Ma, in an obvious attempt to ride on the coat tails of newly elected Lee’s presidential victory, tried on several occasions to draw a parallel between himself and Lee. Aside from using South Korea as an economic example in his campaign speeches, and that the country could serve as a model for Taiwan, he also borrowed Lee’s “7-4-7” policy by proposing a “6-3-3” economic policy of his own that promised to raise GDP growth to 6 percent, trim unemployment to 3 percent and boost per capita income to US$30,000 a year.
Following his election victory, however, Ma has all but ceased comparing Taiwan to South Korea, nor himself to the South Korean president.
The reason is obvious.
The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics in May trimmed the nation’s GDP forecast for this year to minus 4.25 percent. Meanwhile, the nation’s unemployment rate in May was a record high of 5.82 percent, which translated to 633,000 people out of work.
Prior to these disappointing numbers, Ma had already admitted — a mere three months into his presidency — that the realization of his “6-3-3” economic goals would take until the final year of a possible second term as president.
Aside from showing any remorse for failing to honor his campaign promises, as well as the arrogance of delaying delivery of his campaign promise until 2015, by attaching it to a second term, there is still no sign of the donation that Ma promised to make should he fail to deliver on his “6-3-3” policy.
Granted, earlier this year Ma donated NT$360,000 of his year-end bonus to charity groups. That amount, however, was a drop in the ocean compared with the numbers of people in the country suffering from unemployment and increased commodity prices spearheaded by state-run companies.
Some may argue that Ma, like most politicians, should not be taken at his word, but when a head of state repeatedly fails to rise above the usual politicking, it is the public who suffer and this cannot help the nation’s competitiveness.
Ma has the public to thank, because everyone seems to have either forgiven of forgotten the promise. But that doesn’t mean Ma should get away with deceiving people so easily.
Lee’s generosity and compassion should serve to remind us how disingenuous Ma can be.
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
RSS