All politicians seek a catch word or phrase to use for spin and glorification of their policies. Ever since President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) inauguration, one phrase Taiwan and the world have regularly heard bandied about is “Ma’s flexible diplomacy.” What that means is anyone’s guess, but with the recent upheaval in Honduras things took a turn for the worse in finding an appropriate definition.
Previously, some had felt flexible diplomacy meant Ma’s willingness to assume any position that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) wanted him to, in negotiations of course. Others had thought it was Ma’s convenient excuse for being able to claim he supported the Dalai Lama, but still chose not to invite him to Taiwan. Others in a more sarcastic vein explained flexible diplomacy as Ma’s ability to talk out of both sides of his mouth. Honduras changed all that.
Ma had in the works a second trip to Latin America to show his international acumen. Instead, Honduras exposed what has been a recognized problem with Ma both as a mayor and president. Continued wild promises, no matter how rosy, cannot cover a lack of planning and a lack of foresight forever.
Ma’s infamous 6-3-3 promise of Taiwan’s glorious future under him dissolved with the economy quickly tanking. When this promise was made in November 2007, shouldn’t someone on his vast economic team have had a handle on what was going on in the world? Of course all was euphemistically explained — Ma really needed eight years. In 2016, he will be long gone with the booty like former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator Diane Lee (李慶安).
Flexible diplomacy may be catchy, but in reality it is proving to be another political euphemism, a euphemism to cover up a policy of making grand promises and then winging it, or in the more vernacular, flying by the seat of one’s pants.
Honduras is one of the few political allies Taiwan has and had been a major stop for Ma. Despite rumors of potential turmoil there earlier in the week, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) Spokesman Henry Chen (陳銘政) told reporters not to worry. No coup or troubles were going to take place in Honduras. As a matter of fact, Ma was looking forward to visiting Honduran President Manuel Zelaya and that was that.
Unfortunately, two hours before Chen spoke, the Honduran military had burst into Zelaya’s room in the middle of the night, arrested him and quickly exiled him to neighboring Costa Rica. So much for Ma’s team being on top of the situation.
Not to be dismayed, Ma praised his team for being flexible and able to quickly switch plans and cut short his visit by a couple of days, but is that really the case?
True, they were able to catch Ma’s plane before it even entered Honduran airspace, but then came the aftermath. Now it has been decided that Ma does not want to visit Honduras anyway. It was not a top priority — flexible diplomacy? Or just not wanting the hot potato?
The unraveling of the Honduras visit brought to mind Ma’s numerous other promises and how Taiwanese have such a short memory.
Does anyone remember how a year ago Ma touted his flexible diplomacy and how it would bring hordes of Chinese tourists to Taiwan? They in turn would cure Taiwan’s economic woes. We did see a lot of problems with the ill-thought out rush to tourism, but has anyone noticed how great the economy is as a result?
Not to be dismayed, Ma still insists that his China card is the only game in town. Pundits, however, worry. Does he really have an overall plan or is he simply a “one trick pony” whose only trick isn’t panning out?
Signing an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China is the latest brainchild. Don’t worry that Ma’s team does not really know where it is going with this or that, it totally lacks transparency. Ma’s team is used to winging it when it comes to Taiwan’s future. One does not even want to consider the possibility that Ma’s team is being purposely deceptive.
Chen further muddied the waters on Honduras by saying: “The fate of the foreign ministry is that we can be misunderstood, but we can never be wrong.”
This did not help allay fears either. On the contrary, Chen is mirroring Ma’s modus operandi and refuses to answer legitimate questions.
In his own warped way, Ma wants to believe that as emperor he may be misunderstood, but he can never be wrong, even when he wings it. Ma’s spin-doctors are telling the people that they should accept that and believe it.
It is a strange contention. Wake up, Taiwan.
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taipei.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath