Democracy regressing
“Well, look at Taiwan, look at [South] Korea, different places,” US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said recently. (“PRC stalling on human rights: House speaker,” June 7, page 1). While Taiwanese joined others in discussing the slow progress of human rights in China on the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square protest, how many of us noticed that democracy in Taiwan is moving backwards?
Why were the parents of a Tamkang University student warned by police after their child attended the protest held by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) on May 17? Why was a student arrested and investigated by the police just for shouting “Ma Ying-jeou [馬英九] step down!” at a Taiwan High Speed Rail station in March? Why was Sunrise Records shut down by police because they were playing patriotic Taiwanese music when Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) visited Taipei last year?
I can’t believe all these incidents happened in a so-called democratic country. Living in Taiwan in the 21st century, we are supposed to have the basic human right of freedom of speech. Martial Law was lifted in 1987 by former President Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), but maybe Ma forgot about that. Otherwise, why was I warned by an unfriendly policeman with fierce eyes and a pointing finger for having a yellow ribbon with the words “Taiwan is my country” tied to my car?
SALLY WU
Taipei City
Eating meat is not healthy
Thank you for running the story “DPP calls for campaign against US beef imports” (June 26, page 4) on the disturbing negotiations to increase beef imports from the US.
It seems the DPP was right on the money when it said the Department of Health (DOH) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs were jeopardizing public health. Shame on them!
Not to offend anyone, but why do you think the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) is pushing Taiwanese to increase beef imports? For our health? I believe it is strictly for economic reasons.
Earlier this year, the AIT and its Director Stephen Young held a benefit for Taiwan’s needy, including children, providing a free “meat dinner.” This was an obvious marketing scheme by the AIT and nothing more.
The AIT uses phrases like “based on science.” Well I wish the DOH would research more deeply the “real science” behind the problem. For starters, it is quickly becoming known throughout the world that “meat” as a food is absolutely not healthy for the human body. Numerous studies have proven that animal protein promotes heart disease, colon cancer and cardiovascular disease.
The meat industry and those that support it have duped citizens for decades into believing their product is healthy. Only plant protein promotes health. Animal protein detracts from human health. Animals themselves only get their protein from plants. The DOH needs to spread this information to all Taiwanese citizens.
This is the root of the situation — not whether US meat from cattle more than 30 months old should be considered safe or not. In fact, no meat products are safe, not from any country. Numerous diseases come from animal production: swine flu, bird flu, etc.
Meat production is also a major cause of deforestation, and global food and water shortages. I care deeply for my fellow citizens, and sincerely wish they were given the proper information by government bodies instead of about economic and diplomatic maneuvering.
Please, search on the Internet. Read The China Study. Find out why livestock production contributes greatly to global warming.
We as citizens must start to educate ourselves. If the DOH won’t protect and inform us, then it is our responsibility to do so ourselves.
JOHN BRADLEY STONE
Daan,Taipei
Physical punishment useful
Physical punishment has become a controversial issue.
It has existed in families for a long time, but there have in recent years been some arguments against it. Nowadays, most couples have only one or two children. Each child is his or her parents’ treasure. In accordance with the ideal of “lovely education,” parents tend to care about their children too much to punish them. However, it pampers kids with bad behavior, which results in more social problems.
In my opinion, physical punishment is appropriate in some cases. When we punish children, we should clearly tell them what they did wrong and help them to learn their lesson. In that way, children will know that we are not trying to hurt them, but to teach and direct them. The child will not feel “hurt” because of our punishment.
PAT DENG
Keelung
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS