Democracy regressing
“Well, look at Taiwan, look at [South] Korea, different places,” US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said recently. (“PRC stalling on human rights: House speaker,” June 7, page 1). While Taiwanese joined others in discussing the slow progress of human rights in China on the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square protest, how many of us noticed that democracy in Taiwan is moving backwards?
Why were the parents of a Tamkang University student warned by police after their child attended the protest held by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) on May 17? Why was a student arrested and investigated by the police just for shouting “Ma Ying-jeou [馬英九] step down!” at a Taiwan High Speed Rail station in March? Why was Sunrise Records shut down by police because they were playing patriotic Taiwanese music when Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) visited Taipei last year?
I can’t believe all these incidents happened in a so-called democratic country. Living in Taiwan in the 21st century, we are supposed to have the basic human right of freedom of speech. Martial Law was lifted in 1987 by former President Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), but maybe Ma forgot about that. Otherwise, why was I warned by an unfriendly policeman with fierce eyes and a pointing finger for having a yellow ribbon with the words “Taiwan is my country” tied to my car?
SALLY WU
Taipei City
Eating meat is not healthy
Thank you for running the story “DPP calls for campaign against US beef imports” (June 26, page 4) on the disturbing negotiations to increase beef imports from the US.
It seems the DPP was right on the money when it said the Department of Health (DOH) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs were jeopardizing public health. Shame on them!
Not to offend anyone, but why do you think the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) is pushing Taiwanese to increase beef imports? For our health? I believe it is strictly for economic reasons.
Earlier this year, the AIT and its Director Stephen Young held a benefit for Taiwan’s needy, including children, providing a free “meat dinner.” This was an obvious marketing scheme by the AIT and nothing more.
The AIT uses phrases like “based on science.” Well I wish the DOH would research more deeply the “real science” behind the problem. For starters, it is quickly becoming known throughout the world that “meat” as a food is absolutely not healthy for the human body. Numerous studies have proven that animal protein promotes heart disease, colon cancer and cardiovascular disease.
The meat industry and those that support it have duped citizens for decades into believing their product is healthy. Only plant protein promotes health. Animal protein detracts from human health. Animals themselves only get their protein from plants. The DOH needs to spread this information to all Taiwanese citizens.
This is the root of the situation — not whether US meat from cattle more than 30 months old should be considered safe or not. In fact, no meat products are safe, not from any country. Numerous diseases come from animal production: swine flu, bird flu, etc.
Meat production is also a major cause of deforestation, and global food and water shortages. I care deeply for my fellow citizens, and sincerely wish they were given the proper information by government bodies instead of about economic and diplomatic maneuvering.
Please, search on the Internet. Read The China Study. Find out why livestock production contributes greatly to global warming.
We as citizens must start to educate ourselves. If the DOH won’t protect and inform us, then it is our responsibility to do so ourselves.
JOHN BRADLEY STONE
Daan,Taipei
Physical punishment useful
Physical punishment has become a controversial issue.
It has existed in families for a long time, but there have in recent years been some arguments against it. Nowadays, most couples have only one or two children. Each child is his or her parents’ treasure. In accordance with the ideal of “lovely education,” parents tend to care about their children too much to punish them. However, it pampers kids with bad behavior, which results in more social problems.
In my opinion, physical punishment is appropriate in some cases. When we punish children, we should clearly tell them what they did wrong and help them to learn their lesson. In that way, children will know that we are not trying to hurt them, but to teach and direct them. The child will not feel “hurt” because of our punishment.
PAT DENG
Keelung
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS