Last week the government reported that Taiwan’s economy shrank at a record 10.24 percent in the first three months of the year, while exports dropped 36.6 percent and private investment plunged 41 percent for the quarter.
With government officials and economists generally agreeing that the worst is probably over for Taiwan’s economic recession, the public’s attention has now turned to whether the economy is beginning to rebound — either in the form of a V-shaped recovery, a gradual U-shaped revival or a subdued L-shaped curve — and how sustained this rebound will be.
As long as global financial woes continue to drag on the US economy, cripple growth in Japan and Europe and weaken demand for electronics and other exports from emerging markets, no one can say for sure what the prospects of our economy will be.
Even though we have seen waves of rush orders from China and other markets recently, heard cancellations of unpaid leave at some local companies and watched stock market rallies buoyed by foreign capital inflows and capital repatriations by local residents, one thing the public must understand is that the anticipated recovery will be fragile and vulnerable if Taiwan only focuses on developing closer economic integration with China while failing to notice other crucial economic factors.
In the face of weak domestic consumption and falling exports, a key to the pace of Taiwan’s economic recovery is the strength of private investment, which includes local investment and foreign direct investment.
Regardless of where the much-needed private investment is from — local companies, Chinese businesses or other foreign investors — Taiwan can secure this potential investment only when the nation’s investment environment is sound and business infrastructure is competitive.
Unfortunately, the latest GDP data showed that the contraction in private investment has continued for four consecutive quarters since the second quarter of last year, when it dipped 9.92 percent year-on-year.
Considering the massive drop in exports, the government has become more conservative about the private investment outlook, lowering its forecast to a contraction of 29.02 percent for this year from a February forecast of minus 28.07 percent, there could be more bad news to come if the government only becomes complacent because of recent capital inflows while overlooking the weakness in the nation’s investment environment.
The latest global competitiveness report issued by the Switzerland-based International Institute for Management Development (IMD) showed exactly what we should be concerned about. The report showed Taiwan’s global competitiveness ranking among the world’s 57 major economies plunged 10 places from 13th last year to 23rd this year.
The IMD report also showed that Taiwan suffered a big decline in its business efficiency ranking this year, falling 12 places to 22nd place from 10th last year, which indicates a problem in the nation’s industrial structure.
To increase private investment, the government should continue eliminating bureaucratic red tape, facilitating more access to bank loans for small and medium-sized businesses and offering assistance to companies for land acquisition and manpower recruiting. The government should also provide more incentives for the development of green energy-related industries and encourage companies to develop their own brands instead of relying on contract manufacturing. Otherwise, we will certainly face the same problems.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing