“We are not forming coalitions of states, we are uniting people.”
These historical words of Jean Monnet, one of our founding fathers, express in one sentence what the EU has achieved over the last decades. Only 20 years ago the Iron Curtain divided people and ran like a scar through Europe. Today we are celebrating the fifth anniversary of an enlarged and re-united EU, a Union of citizens who have decided together, of their own will, to build a common future, based on the rule of law, an internal market and the gradual abolition of internal borders.
What we have done for ourselves — supporting and consolidating democracy for millions of people — we also wish to help others to accomplish. The EU’s transformational power is a major force for democratic and economic change in neighboring countries, not only in the candidate countries but also in Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean, fostered by the European Neighbourhood Policy.
In the last year we established the “Union for the Mediterranean” with our Mediterranean partners and agreed with them on six flagship projects delivering concrete benefits for citizens of the region. Similarly, we proposed an ambitious new Eastern Partnership aiming at bringing a lasting message of solidarity, with additional, tangible support for democratic and market-oriented reforms and the consolidation of partners’ statehood and territorial integrity.
These changes bring new opportunities, but also new responsibilities for our partners and for a united global Europe. In last summer’s conflict in Georgia and in the gas dispute between Russia and Ukraine, a united and swiftly acting Union showed that it can be a guarantor for stability, freedom and security in our globalized world.
We are rising to this challenge by seeking to build a global consensus to tackle the issues we all face. This is particularly true in finding a global answer to the current global financial and economic crises. The EU has not only become one of the driving forces in the G20, which brings together all global and regional key players, but we also provided the blue print for a global response that resulted in the most ambitious global stimulus to boost the global economy and reshape our globalized world.
This crisis is also an opportunity as it is opening minds to the need to come up with global solutions. Thus, we agreed to work with our G20 partners for a breakthrough on Doha, climate change and energy security, and are frontloading our aid to those developing countries worst hit by falling export revenues.
2009 is not merely a year of crises. It is also a unique moment in the world’s history and a unique opportunity to work together to tackle global issues. A strong global Europe should seize this momentum and make its contribution not only to overcoming the challenges posed by the global financial and economic crisis but also to achieving an ambitious and binding agreement at the climate conference in Copenhagen at the end of this year.
Benita Ferrero-Waldner is the commissioner responsible for the European Commission’s external relations and European Neighborhood Policy.
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
RSS