High rates of obesity in richer countries cause up to 1 billion extra tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions every year, compared with countries with leaner populations, according to a study that assesses the additional food and fuel requirements of the overweight. The finding is particularly worrying, scientists say, because obesity is on the rise in many rich nations.
“Population fatness has an environmental impact,” said Phil Edwards, from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. “We’re all being told to stay fit and keep our weight down because it’s good for our health. The important thing is that staying slim is good for your health and for the health of the planet.”
The study, carried out by Edwards and Ian Roberts, was published on Monday in the International Journal of Epidemiology.
In their model, the researchers compared a population of a billion lean people, with weight distributions equivalent to a country such as Vietnam, with a billion people from richer countries, such as the US, where about 40 percent of the population is classified obese — having an average body mass index of more than 30.
They found the fatter population needed 19 percent more food energy for its total energy requirements. They also factored in greater car use by the overweight.
“The heavier our bodies become, the harder and more unpleasant it is to move about in them and the more dependent we become on our cars,” they wrote.
The greenhouse gas emissions from food production and car travel for the fatter billion people were estimated at between 0.4 billion and 1.0 billion extra tonnes a year. That is a significant amount in comparison with the world’s total emissions of greenhouse gases, which was 27 billion tonnes in 2004.
Edwards said the billion rich people in the model could represent the combined populations of Europe, the US, Australia and other nations with obesity problems.
Last September the world’s leading authority on climate change controversially suggested people should eat less meat to curb global warming because it is argued that meat production causes 20 percent of global emissions.
Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said consumers should begin with one meat-free day a week and then cut back even further if they wanted to make a personal and effective sacrifice that would help tackle climate change.
Kath Dalmeny, policy director of Sustain, a food and farming campaign group, said: “It should come as no surprise that unhealthy food and lifestyles are also bad for the planet. Obesity and climate change are both symptoms of over-consumption. The types of food that cause people to gain weight also use a lot of energy to produce, with high levels of fat and sugar, and with lots of wasteful processing and packaging.”
She added: “The good news is that healthy foods such as fresh, seasonal fruit and veg also tend to be associated with lower greenhouse gas emissions through their whole life cycle.”
Around the world, the average weight of populations is rising. According to the WHO, there were 1.6 billion overweight adults in the world in 2005 — classified as anyone with a body mass index greater than 25. In the same year, there were 400 million obese people.
By 2015, the WHO estimates these figures will rise to 2.3 billion and 700 million respectively.
The latest research is part of a larger study by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine to look at the health benefits of climate change mitigation policies.
Edwards said the work would be fed directly into the agenda for the upcoming UN climate change treaty negotiations in Copenhagen in December.
“We need to be doing a lot more to reverse the global trend towards fatness, and recognize it as a key factor in the battle to reduce emissions and slow climate change,” he added.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath