March is a significant month for Taiwan in many ways. Taiwan’s first presidential election, its first handover of power from one party to another and its first nationwide referendum all happened in March.
March of this year marks the 19th anniversary of the Wild Lilies student movement (野百合學運), the 13th anniversary of the Taiwan Strait missile crisis and the fourth anniversary of the enactment of China’s “Anti-Secession” Law.
These anniversaries represent the course of the Taiwanese people’s struggle for democracy and peace, their refusal to be intimidated by China and their brave determination to defend Taiwan.
March is also an unforgettable month for Tibetans. Fifty years ago, the Chinese government tore up its 17-point agreement with Tibet and sent in its army. Amid the bloodshed, many Tibetans fled abroad, never to return to their homeland.
China has never ceased its oppression in Tibet during the following five decades. A year ago, serious unrest erupted in Lhasa, the truth about which remains unclear. Indeed, for Tibetans, March is a month of harsh and painful memories.
Tibetan blood, tears and pain should serve as a warning to Taiwan that, when confronted with an oppressive power, compromise and concessions will not bring peace.
Four years ago, China enacted its “Anti-Secession” Law, specifying at what time and under what conditions China would use armed force against Taiwan. The passage of this law was a blatant attempt to intimidate the Taiwanese.
At the time, I was chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party. Determined to protest in the strongest terms against China’s threats and to make Taiwan’s voice heard around the world, our party joined 500 civic groups to launch a major demonstration.
Demonstrators converged on downtown Taipei along 10 routes — 40km altogether. One million people answered the call to take part, marching shoulder-to-shoulder and shouting, “democracy, peace, defend Taiwan,” sentiments that were heard and understood all around the world. The following year, I was appointed premier.
During my premiership, I declared that March 14 each year would be “Anti-Aggression Day” as an expression of the Taiwanese people’s determination not to tolerate aggression by their powerful neighbor.
Other parties, however, took a different attitude. At the very time that our country was being threatened, former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) chose to visit China, thereby helping Beijing to give the world a false impression of detente across the Taiwan Strait.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who was at the time mayor of Taipei, publicly criticized me for organizing a mass demonstration against China’s “Anti-Secession” Law, calling it a “provocation,” and he downplayed the size of the protest, claiming that only 270,000 people joined the march.
Every key point in history serves as a test of people’s words and actions.
Last year, four days before ballots were cast in the presidential election, Ma proclaimed six points of solemn protest against China’s bloody suppression of Tibetans following unrest in Lhasa.
Ma denounced Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) as “arbitrary, unreasonable, arrogant and foolish,” and said that if China continued its oppression in Tibet, he would not rule out boycotting the Beijing Olympics.
Ma appeared to be taking a strong moral stance in condemning China and supporting Tibet.
Two-and-a-half months after Ma took office as president, it was a different story.
In its Handbook for Spectators at the Beijing Olympics, the Sports Affairs Council warned Taiwanese who went to watch the Games in Beijing not to take national flags into the sports venues, as to do so would be in breach of Chinese laws.
Later, when asked by a foreign journalist about the Dalai Lama’s declared wish to visit Taiwan, Ma ruled out such a visit, saying that the timing was inappropriate.
This year marks the 50th anniversary of the Tibetan Uprising. Ordinary Taiwanese sympathizing with the Tibetans have organized several activities in support of Tibet.
Ma, however, has not uttered so much as a word of support.
KMT Legislator Wu Yu-sheng (吳育升), a favorite of Ma, went so far as to propose in his draft Memorial Days and Festivals Act (國定紀念日與節日法) to remove Mar. 14, Anti-Aggression Day, from the list of official memorial days.
Ma’s silence in the face of China’s hegemony and oppression is a cause for disappointment among Tibetans and anger among Taiwanese.
In this month of March, let’s pray for Tibet and resolve to fight for Taiwan.
Despite our disappointment and anger, we have many tasks before us.
We have a long way to go in defending Taiwan.
As long as we choose the right road and keep walking, we will surely reach our goal.
Let’s move forward together.
Su Tseng-chang is a former premier.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
RSS