Last week, several executives at local computer memory companies were shocked at remarks made by the government’s designated semiconductor czar for the struggling industry, who said government-funded Taiwan Memory Co would focus on seeking technological alliances with foreign chipmakers and that it would purchase factories from local chipmakers, but not pursue an outright merger.
The executives were further frustrated when the Ministry of Economic Affairs said local companies that produce dynamic random access memory (DRAM) chips would have to solve their own financial problems and not rely on Taiwan Memory or the government.
Of course, the executives were disappointed and angry because the government’s policy is very different from what most people had expected when it launched Taiwan Memory. With the policy change, local DRAM companies will likely receive no government funds to bail them out of the current mess.
Whether the cause of the policy change was over concerns about complicated mergers or simply misunderstanding and miscommunication, the government shoulders the blame for allowing DRAM companies to harbor unrealistic expectations on a government rescue for the past months — up until last week.
But what really mattered was that the government made it clear that it was not its responsibility to rescue individual companies using taxpayers’ money.
Moreover, it has become evident that chipmakers should assume the responsibility for the losses they have generated over years of expansion and oversupply. These companies owe an apology to their shareholders and investors, especially now their shares are little more than penny stocks and their debt is rising continuously.
Unfortunately, we have not heard any of these firms apologize to shareholders and investors. The companies continue to blame everyone but themselves.
Previously, they criticized the government for restricting their investments in China. Then they attributed years of oversupply and falling prices to volatility in the highly cyclical industry. Recently, they blamed a lack of liquidity in the banking sector for their financial difficulty.
Ironically, despite all of their obvious misjudgments and bad management, most executives at these DRAM companies have not compromised their compensation packages to cope with a slowing business, but left employees, shareholders and investors to pay a hefty price — job losses and falling share prices.
Everyone makes mistakes and bad decisions. Even US billionaire Warren Buffett made investment mistakes — especially in financial derivatives — that saw his Berkshire Hathaway Inc record its worst ever financial results last year.
But Buffett apologized to shareholders in his annual letter on Feb. 27, admitting that he did some “dumb things” last year and made “at least one major mistake ... and several lesser ones that also hurt.”
While many of Berkshire’s losses last year were unrealized on long-term derivatives contracts and the firm predicts that the contracts will ultimately be profitable, Buffett did not try to escape responsibility.
“If we lose money on our derivatives, it will be my fault,” he said in the letter.
Taiwan’s DRAM companies do have the right to criticize the government’s change of policy. But given the industry’s gloomy prospects and their rising debt, no one can deny that the time has come to address the issue of a graceful exit from the business.
Instead of pointing fingers at others, the companies should face up to their own mistakes and offer an apology to shareholders and investors.
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
The Ministry of the Interior late last month released its report on homes that consumed low amounts of electricity in the second half of last year, offering a glimpse of the latest data on “vacant houses” — homes using less than 60 kilowatt-hours of electricity a month. The report showed that Taiwan had 914,196 vacant houses, or a vacancy rate of 9.79 percent, up from 9.32 percent in the first half of last year and the highest since 2008, when it was 9.81 percent. Of the nation’s 22 administrative areas, Lienchiang County (Matsu) had the highest vacancy rate at 17.4
RSS