By Feb. 6, the currencies of South Korea, Australia, Singapore and Taiwan had devaluated by 11.75, 7.58, 5.56 and 4.26 percent respectively and they are continuing to slide. Devaluation seems to have become the panacea for saving Asian exports.
The global economic tsunami has caused a serious downturn. The main reason behind falling Asian exports is the credit crunch, faltering demand and weakening purchasing power in Europe and the US. Many countries are now having a hard time and are beginning to save. This means that Asian countries are not to blame for their falling export figures. However, it is not very wise to rely on devaluation to try to stimulate exports that are falling as a result of weak foreign demand.
The result of this devaluation competition is that there will be no devaluation to speak of, as there will be no drastic changes in relative prices among exporting countries, thus greatly reducing the effectiveness of devaluation. Devaluation also means that the cost of raw materials and equipment imports will go up. This is not helpful to the development of Asia’s economy, which is characterized by its focus on export processing production. More seriously, once the devaluation atmosphere begins to build expectations, capital outflows will speed up and foreign reserves will shrink. The most serious consequence of this could be a monetary crisis that could break out at any moment. The 1997 to 1998 Asian financial crisis is a good example.
The way to resolve this problem would be to take the opportunity offered by the global financial crisis to improve the distorted structure with excessive Western consumption and Asian countries doing their best to keep production up to meet Western demands, while at the same time continuing to save to make up for Western spending.
In other words, the most important economic issue for Asia now is to find ways for its countries to collectively expand domestic demand and allow their people to share the fruits of past economic development. Asian nations are not short of cash. Among the top 10 countries with the most foreign reserves, which account for more than 60 percent of the world’s foreign reserves, seven are in Asia. The Asian economy’s biggest problem lies in high savings and low consumption.
Therefore, the best way is to expand domestic demand while strengthening regional economic and trade integration. Most important, the primary task should be to build a common currency unit, so as to stabilize the regional exchange rate structure and prevent a financial crisis from happening.
Asian countries must end their total dependence on exports to the US and Europe to stimulate their economies and end their reliance on devaluation as the way to boost exports. The results of the devaluation game will be that foreign reserves built up through years of hard work will be siphoned off by speculators.
Thus, the focus should gradually be shifted toward Asian consumer markets. This is the only way for Asia to be able to sustain its own development and eventually stand side by side with the EU and North America. It would also be beneficial to global economic development and a more equalized global income distribution. This is perhaps the most important lesson that Asia can take away from the global financial crisis, and it also offers the greatest opportunity for Asian regional economic development.
Chuang Yih-chyi is an economics professor at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past