As you enter a building on the northern rim of the campus at the University of Leicester in central England, the colorful signboard that catches your eye suggests science at the cutting edge. Whether or not the Space Research Center deserves this tag, cutting-edge would be absolutely the right description for the work being carried out by one of the building’s other inhabitants.
Sarah Hainsworth is an engineer who, for the past few years, has been investigating the sharpness of knives — and not just knives, but screwdrivers, scissors and even ballpoint pens. Any implement, in fact, that has featured as a murder weapon.
“If you give somebody a knife and ask them if it’s sharp, how do you measure that? How do you quantify sharpness?” Hainsworth said. “I suppose that’s what we’ve been trying to do.”
The cutlery industry has measured the effectiveness of the slicing edges of blades designed for chopping up vegetables or carving meat, and how best to maintain that sharpness, she says.
“But what nobody has really done is to investigate the sharpness of points,” she said.
They certainly have now. Hainsworth sometimes spends whole afternoons dropping knives from various heights on to foam or legs of pork — a close substitute for human skin — and recording the results in finest detail.
The ease with which a blade penetrates the human body has become an important consideration in court cases.
“When there’s been a stabbing, one of the common defenses is: I didn’t mean to kill; the knife was extremely sharp,” Hainsworth said.
The implication is that the accused is less guilty because they had not used extreme force.
Hainsworth began looking at knife sharpness in 1999 when she was leading an undergraduate project about materials that might improve their ability to retain a keen edge. Because of this work she was approached five years ago by a solicitor.
“A knife had been used in a murder,” she said. “It had made a wound of significant depth through the chest and into the spine. The accused had said he always kept his knives extremely sharp. I was asked whether I could verify this so they could use it as a defense.”
After testing the knife, she established that it was not sharp.
“I imagine the solicitor rejected that line of defense,” she said.
It was while working on that case that Hainsworth realized there was a gap in knowledge. The existing research had been short-term and was out of date.
“What we really needed to do was look at this with some of the modern tools that are available to engineers,” she said.
This lack of convincing research was posing a problem for the criminal justice system, she said.
“The courts in the first instance will ask the forensic pathologist for an indication of the degree of force required in a stabbing offense and the pathologist might assess the sharpness by testing the blade on their fingers. When you’re trying to communicate to a jury how sharp something is, I don’t think that is a particularly convincing assessment. And it’s open to criticism from the barrister on the opposing side that the method is unscientific,” she said.
Is Hainsworth’s work likely to help more people mount successful defenses against the most serious charges of violence involving knives? She cites two cases in response.
“In one, the weapon was relatively blunt and the prosecution barrister argued that because it was blunt, considerable force was used, and that influenced the sentence. I had another case where I found the weapon to be sharp, and the barrister argued that the accused had knowingly kept the knife very sharp and had taken it to use as a weapon in that knowledge,” she said.
Since beginning her research, Hainsworth said she had been asked to look at the weapons used in around a dozen cases. It has brought home to her the extent to which knives are the weapon of choice.
“Murder by knife has been the most preferred form of murder in the last few years,” she said.
A key conclusion of a research project begun in 2004 is that the tip of a knife is crucial in assessing how much force is needed to puncture the human frame. Hainsworth and colleagues have gone much further. They have established a method of measuring the sharpness of a knifepoint so that it can be positioned on a scale of sharpness and compared with other knives.
Using high-speed video film, they have gained a better understanding of the “mechanism” by which blades penetrate skin. This shows that there are a number of stages. At first contact, the skin deflects around the knife tip. At a critical stress level the knife penetrates the skin. After penetration the sharpness of both tip and blade are important in determining how much further the knife goes in.
Stress is an engineering term expressed as force, measured in Newtons divided by area, Hainsworth said. The force required to stab a person with a sharp knife is less than you might expect, she said.
“Often, once the point has gone through the skin, the force required to go further is even less,” she said.
So, is there ever credibility in the sort of excuse that runs: “I was just trying to scare him and the next moment he was lying dead?”
“In some cases, yes,” she said.
Other factors come into play in a stabbing, for instance the angle of strike and the width of blade. In further research, Hainsworth will replicate knife attacks using an accelerometer, a device that records the rapid changes in force used.
In her experience, the kitchen knife is the weapon most commonly used in murders. In recent years, more and more of these have been made with sharper tips — not necessary for the slicing and peeling most are designed for. Hainsworth suspects this is because people buying knives are often seen to check out the tip on their thumb rather then the long edge, and manufacturers have noticed this tendency.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath