On Dec. 12, the Judicial Reform Foundation, the Humanistic Education Foundation and other organizations gathered at Liberty Square in front of the National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall in support of Huang Yi-ling (黃怡翎), Tseng Hung-wen (曾虹文) and Lin Yun-tzu (林芸姿), all victims of police brutality during the visit of Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林). The organizations also criticized the police for abusing their power.
Shortly after, the trio went to the Taipei District Court for their lawsuit against former Songshan Precinct police chief Huang Chia-lu (黃嘉祿). I also attended, supporting them out of my own free will, but also to familiarize myself with the surroundings. With the government joining hands with China to suppress Taiwanese, I might have to attend court against my will one day.
Maybe this will happen sooner than I expected. For on Monday, the neighborhood police came looking for me. There was no one at home, but when my wife made enquiries later on, she was told that they wanted me to fill in forms relating to “mainland individuals.”
My wife replied that since I am from Hong Kong, the law regards me as an “overseas Chinese from Hong Kong,” not a “mainland individual.”
I lived in Hong Kong for 21 years, and twice during this time — first in 1992 and then again in 1995 — the Chinese government confiscated my Home Return Certificate for Compatriots from Hong Kong and Macau; it didn’t see me as a compatriot. When I left Hong Kong for the US in 1997, I traveled on a “British National (Overseas)” passport, and when I applied to enter Taiwan, it was with this passport.
In the winter of 2005, the pan-green camp suffered a difficult defeat in the three-in-one elections, and I worried that Taiwan would become a sacrificial object in the government’s policy of joining hands with China. In the spring of the following year, I settled in Taiwan.
Since my wife is Taiwanese and I am from Hong Kong, I was granted Republic of China (ROC) citizenship after one year and obtained an ROC passport. Both the National Immigration Agency and the local police are well aware of all this information. I moved into a new home almost a year ago and I registered my new address as soon as I moved.
Now the police suddenly want to treat me as a “mainland individual” and require my “data.” They are surely intending this as a warning and probably want to register me as a “mainland individual” to be able to control me. Aren’t they aware that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) himself is from Hong Kong?
In an interview with FTV, Ma said that police abuse was being investigated, but what is there to investigate, given that those who were to be promoted have been promoted? Now they are investigating me instead of the police.
I came to Taiwan for a very simple reason: I care for this land and its democratic system. That is also why I don’t want Taiwan to fall into the hands of Chinese thugs. Since Taiwan is my home, I enthusiastically participate in activities to safeguard it, including around the time of Chen’s visit.
I called on Taiwanese not to fight each other — including the police and the public — because the police were being forced to carry out Ma’s orders. In doing so, I offended the forces that work to divide and betray Taiwan.
Since they are preparing to take action against me, I will make my intentions clear: I will continue to participate in activities that safeguard Taiwan. If the government takes any action against me or if I am framed, or if I have an accident, the guilty party will be Ma and his backers in the Chinese Communist Party.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
The Central Election Commission (CEC) on Friday announced that recall motions targeting 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) have been approved, and that a recall vote would take place on July 26. Of the recall motions against 35 KMT legislators, 31 were reviewed by the CEC after they exceeded the second-phase signature thresholds. Twenty-four were approved, five were asked to submit additional signatures to make up for invalid ones and two are still being reviewed. The mass recall vote targeting so many lawmakers at once is unprecedented in Taiwan’s political history. If the KMT loses more
RSS