Did you know that gas and diesel in EU states now contain a minimum of 2.5 percent biofuels? Thanks to the Renewable Transport Fuels Obligation, this requirement will rise to 5 percent by 2010. While motorists won’t notice any difference when filling up, this important change is expected to prevent the emission of millions of tonnes of carbon dioxide over the next few years.
But might biofuels be helping to solve one major environmental issue simply to create another? For Valerie Dupont, of Leeds University in northern England, the increasing use of biofuels means a sticky problem. For every tonne of biodiesel made from vegetable oil, 100kg of thick, viscous glycerol is produced as a byproduct. The annual 6.8 billion liters of biodiesel production in the EU yields around 680,000 tonnes of crude glycerol. Although some of the sweet-tasting liquid can be purified for pharmaceutical or food applications, the rest ends up as waste.
Dupont, who has a PhD in fuel and energy, now hopes to turn this growing lake of low-grade sludge into high-value hydrogen gas. Produced from vegetable oils and methanol, biodiesel is a renewable alternative to ordinary diesel. But what green-minded motorists don’t realize is that glycerol is creating a big problem.
“Glycerol is thick, viscous, full of oxygen and you cannot burn it easily,” Dupont says. “Nobody knows what to do with all this glycerol from biodiesel. There is no real outlet.”
Most waste glycerol is currently disposed of by incineration, a less than ideal arrangement. Burning the glycerol in a power station might seem an option but, Dupont says, poor energy conversion and inefficient combustion produces pollutants.
Glycerol — C3H5(OH)3 — is a molecule of three carbon atoms with eight hydrogen and three oxygen atoms. Unlock the hydrogen, and you’d have a rich source of fuel from renewable resources. At the moment, the world’s hydrogen mostly comes from the steam from the reforming of natural gas — methane (CH4) — which produces hydrogen and carbon monoxide.
“Since glycerol has a high hydrogen content compared to methane, we reckon that converting crude glycerol to hydrogen is a valid alternative route,” Dupont says.
Based on earlier research work, Dupont and her co-investigators are developing a viable process to release pure hydrogen and carbon dioxide (CO2) from glycerol.
The 18-month £270,000 (US$410,000) project involves mixing glycerol with steam over a catalyst at a controlled temperature and pressure. A reusable CO2 adsorbent ensures the carbon monoxide (CO) produced reacts fully with the steam, making even more hydrogen and CO2.
“Our process is a clean, renewable alternative to conventional methods. It produces something with high value from a low grade by-product,” Dupont says. “In addition, it’s a near carbon-neutral process, since the CO2 generated is not derived from the use of fossil fuels.”
The project is using a prototype chemical reactor which will quickly answer many practical questions including the effects of impurities. Dupont is also taking a green engineering approach, aiming for a high-purity hydrogen product that would be ideal for fuel cells.
“If everything goes well, we can look at scaling up and maybe even scaling down,” Dupont says. “If we had a reactor which could extract the hydrogen from glycerol it would be very interesting for distributed power generation.”
While hydrogen and fuel cells go nicely together, the gas is already heavily used for fertilizers, chemical plants and food production. However, making hydrogen using natural gas or even water electrolysis is expensive and unsustainable. Finding a new source makes sense.
“Hydrogen has been identified as a key future fuel for low carbon energy systems such as power generation in fuel cells and as a transport fuel,” Dupont says.
Graham Hutchings of Cardiff University has other possibilities in mind. He’s working on a UK government-funded research project involving Imperial College and Cambridge University to find different uses for waste glycerol.
“There is a glycerol problem, so people are looking for opportunities to do anything other than burn it. Turning it into hydrogen is a neat idea,” Hutchings says.
His project is therefore seeking “high tonnage” answers by turning glycerol into valuable monomers for plastics production, biodegradable solvents and even fragrances. There are several research threads, currently confidential, being worked on.
“We’re looking for things that have real application,” Hutchings says.
This could include biodegradable polymers for plastic bags or perhaps solvents for paints. If such uses are developed, the glycerol glut might well become a welcome bonus.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS