Locally grown, pesticide-free food is gaining sway these days because it is fresh, healthy and supports area farmers. But how many of us give the same kind of thought to the Christmas trees we bring home? Can you decorate your Fraser fir without getting pesticide residue in your lungs and on your skin?
Sure, if the tree is certified organic by the US Department of Agriculture. Or if it is a Certified Naturally Grown tree, which meets the same basic requirements: It was raised without synthetic pesticides or fertilizers, using sustainable methods like composting and erosion control.
Certified Naturally Grown, a US organization with 500 members from 47 states, was founded in 2002 by small farmers looking for an alternative that didn’t require a licensing fee and complicated record-keeping.
State groups like the Farmer’s Pledge, sponsored by the Northeast Organic Farming Association of New York, can also provide assurances that a tree has been grown sustainably. Or if you buy your tree from a local grower, like Mike Ludgate, who manages Ludgate Farms, a natural foods and farm store on the outskirts of Ithaca, New York, you can simply ask how the trees were raised.
“We buy and resell our trees from one of my neighbors, who doesn’t spray,” said Ludgate, who also sells greens for wreaths and swags from trees he has grown himself for 20 years without chemicals.
But many Christmas trees — which, after all, are sold for their beauty — are sprayed with pesticides, especially those grown on the large tree plantations in Oregon, North Carolina, Michigan and Canada. How much residue is left once the trees are cut down is a matter of some dispute, as is any risk that might be associated with it.
“Many of the pesticides, particularly the organophosphates and pyrethroids, will break down in rain and UV light,” said Thomas Arcury, a professor and research director for the Department of Family and Community Medicine at Wake Forest University School of Medicine, in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, who is studying the effects of these chemicals on farm workers.
“Some residues would probably remain, just as they remain on the food we eat. How much that is — how dangerous that is — nobody knows,” he said.
BIG BUSINESS
Christmas trees are big business: More than 31 million were sold in the US last year, for US$1.3 billion, the National Christmas Tree Association said.
Oregon, the US’ No. 1 producer, ships mostly Noble and Douglas firs; North Carolina, the second largest, specializes in the Fraser fir. Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Washington state, New York and Virginia are also big producers; depending on soil and climate, they grow Scotch pine, Douglas fir, Noble fir, Fraser fir, Virginia pine, Balsam fir, white pine and blue spruce.
In each of these states there are small growers who do not spray their trees. Cut-your-own tree farms are usually less likely to use pesticides, and farmers’ markets often sell trees that have been sprayed minimally, or not at all.
Getting a tree at a city lot, a large garden center or a big-box store, though, generally means buying blind. These trees are most likely shipped in from plantations where they are grown in vast monocultures subject to insects and disease.
When buying a tree at a big-box store, said John Kepner, the project director at Beyond Pesticides, a nonprofit group in Washington, you “have no idea where it’s coming from, so you have to worry a little bit. A lot of stuff growers are using can’t be used in the home anymore. And you can’t wash a tree off like a tomato.”
Large growers like Cline Church, in Fleetwood, North Carolina, who ships about 60,000 Fraser firs a year up and down the East Coast and into the Midwest, dismiss the idea that there could be enough leftover pesticide on trees to pose a significant health risk.
“As far as residue on these trees, there’s nothing that’s been found, to my knowledge,” he said.
“We use them according to the label, and what the EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] tells us. What else have we got to go on?” he said.
Whatever the risk, the good news is that pesticide use has been cut in half over the last 10 years, said Jill Pennington, a plant pathologist and forestry specialist at North Carolina State University, who surveyed 336 growers in western North Carolina in 2001 and 352 last year, and compared those figures with a 1995 survey of 294 growers in the same region by Steve Toth, a pesticide specialist at the university.
Integrated pest management, a technique increasingly used to monitor pests and to limit spraying, has reduced the use of pesticides, Pennington said, as has the cost of petroleum-based pesticides, fuel and labor, and an increased awareness of health and environmental risks.
NECESSITY
In New York, tree farms may be smaller, but spraying is still viewed as a necessity.
Gary Couch, an integrated pest management specialist at Cornell University, surveyed 150 New York state Christmas tree growers last year. Because of needle-cast disease, “a fungus that affects new growth early in the spring,” he said, most growers still feel compelled to spray with chlorothalonil, “the only fungicide registered against that disease in New York state.”
But Couch said small farmers are increasingly aware of the health and environmental risks.
Thirteen years ago, Curtis Buchanan, who runs Glen Ayre Tree Farm, in Mitchell County, North Carolina, stopped using pesticides because he was concerned about the runoff. Buchanan, 55, now grows organic Christmas trees with his father, John, 85, between fallow strips of native weeds and wildflowers, where natural predators keep the pests down. This year he expects to sell about 190 trees.
After he made the change, Buchanan said, he noticed people coming back for health reasons.
“Customers would say, ‘Yours is the only tree my kids can have in the house, because they’re allergic to chemicals,’” he said.
Some large producers are making similar changes and marketing those efforts.
Joe Sharp, the owner of Yule Tree Farms in Aurora, Oregon, which ships 600,000 trees a year, teamed up last year with Holiday Tree Farms, which ships more than a million trees a year out of Corvallis, Oregon, to form the Coalition of Environmentally Conscious Growers.
The trees grown in this program must follow specific sustainable practices: planting buffer zones near wetlands and streams; keeping records of pests, diseases and pesticide application; analyzing soil and nutrient needs before fertilizing and recording methods of weed control. The group now has four member farms and expects to sell more than 2 million trees this year.
So those of us looking for that perfect tree have a lot of options. And not surprisingly, despite disagreements about the use of pesticides, most growers can agree on one thing: fresh trees are preferable to fake ones.
Artificial trees are “made of oil-based products, they often contain lead and they’re not recyclable,” Sharp said.
Real trees hold the soil, purify the air and can be used after Christmas, to mulch your roses.
And another thing: they are beautiful.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath