Could the British government’s plan to borrow and spend its way out of a recession lead to a run on the pound?
George Osborne, the Conservative Party’s spokesman on such matters, warned of just such an outcome this month, and Business Secretary Peter Mandelson accused him of being “reckless and irresponsible.”
In the last few days, Osborne again accused British Prime Minister Gordon Brown of driving Britain toward bankruptcy, but he avoided any mention of what one of the biggest borrowing surges in British history might do to its already fragile currency.
All the same, a feeling is building that Osborne may have a point. The pound, already down more than 26 percent from its high of US$2.11 a year ago, could fall further once the economy begins to feel the strain from the increased debt.
“Any economy with our level of borrowing and our deficit of trade should have one of the world’s weakest currencies, not the strongest,” said Peter Hargreaves, chief executive of Hargreaves Lansdown, an independent brokerage firm in Bristol. “We don’t make anything anymore, and our biggest export was the City of London, which is in disarray. We are in a very poor state.”
Hargreaves sees the pound falling to US$1.25 — it was at US$1.54 on Friday — and he has recently moved ¥20 million into US Treasury bills and instruments denominated in, among other currencies, the Norwegian krone.
“I just don’t think this country understands how serious the problem is,” he said.
Britain has a deep, emotional connection with its currency, the world’s oldest still in use. Crashes, when they come — as they did in 1967, 1976 and 1992 — have been seen as moments of wrenching national shame.
The pound’s buoyant decade under Brown’s predecessor, Tony Blair, came to be seen as a lush emblem of Britain’s financial and popular resurgence. Middle Eastern and Russian billionaires accumulated British assets, and American investment bankers, once happy to be paid in dollars, schemed to see how they might manage to secure their bonuses in pounds.
Now, unemployment is rising, house prices are falling and economic growth is a faraway hope. Britain is seen as having relied too much on volatile sectors like housing, finance and retail. The numbers paint a stark picture: Britain’s public debt is expected to double to more than £1 trillion by 2012 — or about 60 percent of its GDP.
Still, when it comes to the currency — the ultimate barometer of an economy’s heath and future prospects — few forecasters have predicted an outright collapse. In fact, after touching a recent low of US$1.48, the pound has rallied, lifted by the government’s stimulus plan, which includes cuts in the sales tax and £3 billion in capital spending. Government officials said in the last week that the steep income tax increases built into the program, aimed at high earners, were there to assure currency markets that these high debt levels would not be permanent.
According to Bloomberg, the average forecast by City economists for the pound at the end of next year is US$1.62. It is US$1.66 for 2010. The City is London’s financial district. Of course, currency forecasting in the midst of a historic financial crisis is an imprecise art. And such estimates do not square with a growing pessimism about the pound’s future that can be readily heard from the salons of West London to the trading desks of investments banks, where a popular bet has become when, as opposed to if, the pound might hit parity with the dollar.
The last time sterling came close to parity was February 1985, when the currency dipped below US$1.10, with Britain hobbled by labor unrest and a deep recession.
“Parity is not impossible,” said Theo Casey, an investment strategist at The Fleet Street Letter, a financial newsletter that has been forecasting the collapse of the pound since August. “We are this tiny island dependent on finance and housing. We are crashing and it will continue.”
His newsletter foresees a return to past sterling crises, most notoriously the one in 1976, when Britain had to seek a bailout from the IMF. According to Casey, such dire prognostications have hit a chord: newsletter subscriptions have risen more than 30 percent since its call on sterling.
Willem Buiter, a political economist at the London School of Economics, points out in his widely read blog, Maverecon, that there are two factors in this crisis that were missing during previous sterling reversions.
The first is that the pound now floats freely, making it more vulnerable to the whims of speculators. The second is the added burden of a devastated banking sector.
These elements are joined by the one common cause of past currency panics: a bet made by currency speculators that the highly leveraged British state will become insolvent.
“A sterling crisis would not be something highly unusual, if your idea of the distant past is not the market trader’s last month,” Buiter wrote recently, voicing sympathy for Osborne’s warning that the Labor plan might ruin the pound.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath