Sat, Nov 29, 2008 - Page 9 News List

Victims of journalism's deadliest decade

Most of the casualties are brave and unprotected independents, local journalists covering politics, corruption and crime in their own countries who are murdered to stop their investigations and deter others

By Richard Sambrook  /  THE OBSERVER

Mexican crime reporter Armando Rodriguez got into his car at eight in the morning with his young daughter just over a week ago. Then someone shot him eight times. His daughter, Ximena, witnessed the attack but was unharmed. A week earlier, Rodriguez, who reported on crime and drug trafficking, had received a text message warning him to “tone it down.”

The same day, Russian environmental reporter Mikhail Beketov was found unconscious, badly beaten and bleeding, outside his flat in Khimki, northwest of Moscow. He remains in a serious condition. He had published articles critical of the environmental record of the local administration and last year received a “warning” when his car was set alight during the night.

The following day, two journalists, one Japanese, the other Afghan, were shot in Peshawar, in north western Pakistan. They both survived, but one was seriously injured with bullet wounds in the chest.

I wish I could say that these are isolated incidents. In June, the BBC lost two local journalists, both murdered, in the same weekend. Nasteh Dahir Farah was shot in Somalia and the following day Abdul Samad Rohani was shot dead in Lashkar Gah in Afghanistan. These events highlight the dangers faced in reporting from some of the most unstable parts of the globe and the personal sacrifices individuals and their families make to bring these stories to the world.

News organizations take the issue of risk very seriously. The BBC was among the first to develop safety training and support for journalists working in hostile environments.

It is never possible to eradicate risk but a lot of expertise has been developed by the bigger news organizations in how to protect their staff. It remains the case that the majority of those killed or injured are local journalists, rather than employees of big international news services.

This has been journalism’s deadliest decade. The toll of journalists and media staff killed in conflicts or murdered by the people they were investigating has risen remorselessly, from 70 in 2002 to the unprecedented peaks of 2006 and last year, when 173 died in each year. This is against an average of two journalists or news staff killed every week for the past 10 years while carrying out their work.

The figures for this year are looking a little better: still far too high, but significantly down on the previous two years.

The latest figures (as at Nov. 11) from the International News Safety Institute (INSI) — a coalition of news organizations, journalist support groups and individuals exclusively dedicated to the safety of news media staff working in dangerous environments — show that 75 journalists have died so far this year.

An analysis of the figures for this year by Nick Mosdell and Janet Harris of the journalism school at Cardiff University, Wales, suggests a number of reasons why the numbers are down. Iraq is still the most dangerous country in the world to be a journalist, but the death toll is down, both in overall numbers and as a proportion of the total deaths worldwide.

This is no doubt partly as a result of the relative decline of the insurgency and the work of the Iraqi government and Iraqi media organizations to protect journalists. But all the 15 journalists and media workers killed so far this year were Iraqis, underlining how much frontline reporting for the rest of the world’s media is being carried out by local journalists.

This story has been viewed 2870 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top