Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) and Straits Exchange Foundation Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤), both technocrats with a background in foreign trade, should be able to remember the advice the older generation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) cadres gave when Taiwan’s economy took off: Trade must not be too dependent on the US and Japan and should develop a wider market to distribute risk.
In the second half of the 20th century the US and Japan had no ambitions to annex Taiwan, but the governments of dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) still distributed risk.
Now that Taiwan is faced with the threat of China’s attempt to annex Taiwan — using both carrot and stick — Siew and Chiang are following the lead of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in accelerating the move westward and economic reliance on China. They are also prioritizing the economy over political issues in their march toward eventual unification.
Anyone alert and willing enough to take a detached look at reality will see that economic dependence on China is an unforgivable mistake. The “Chinese rise” that Ma, Siew, Chiang and former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) see does not include the Chinese economy’s weaknesses and dependence on foreign markets in its narrative.
Domestic purchasing power in China, an economy with 1.3 billion people and around 70 percent dependence on foreign markets, is limited. In the past, when Taiwan relied on the US and Japanese markets, we used to catch a cold when the US sneezed. Now Taiwanese industry has moved westward, and China is so dependent on the US market that when the US sneezes these days, China gets pneumonia and Taiwan has to be taken to intensive care.
A responsible government should safeguard the national interest, protect the public and warn of dangers, but the Ma government is behaving in exactly the opposite way. Its trust in China is disproportionate to the reality that is being reported by the international media and even Chinese officials.
Here are two examples.
On Nov. 14, the New York Times reported that factories in China’s Pearl River Delta were closing, and that one Taiwanese businessman who could not pay his employees’ salaries had fled in the middle of the night. The article said that 67,000 factories had gone into bankruptcy in the first half of the year, and that according to official Guangdong Province statistics, 7,000 of those plants were located in Guangdong alone. This is leading not only to unemployment but also protests and social unrest.
Long Yongtu (龍永圖), secretary-general of the Boao Forum, has admitted that China has been affected by the global financial crisis, and says that the period between this February or March and the end of next year will be critical. He also says that “industry cannot be allowed to collapse or industrialists flee.”
This is evidence of the weakness of China’s economy as a result of its dependence on export markets and the seriousness of the problem involving businesspeople who take the money and run.
The population of Taiwan has just passed 23 million. The government will not be able to solve the unemployment crisis by means of the service industry, but it can rely on manufacturing and exports to maintain growth and boost employment.
Taiwan must rely both on foreign markets and greater attention to risk distribution, but the Ma administration, drunk on its own ideology, is falling into the black hole of Chinese politics and economics.
Shen Chieh is a freelance writer.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS