The right time to celebrate
We all saw the reaction of certain Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers to former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) being handcuffed: They wanted to celebrate with firecrackers.
It so happens that presidential candidates and politicians have opponents with whom they must debate. It so happens that presidents do not gain the support of everyone in the country. Political opponents do not have to love each other — but they can show respect.
Most importantly, lawmakers produce and guard laws, and they should never forget the principle of ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat — the burden of proof rests on he who asserts, not on he who denies.
The reaction of KMT lawmakers, mocking the former president, and their statements celebrating his arrest are shameless and should be condemned by the Harvard-educated president, the leaders of the party and the media. It is yet another below-standard performance made in Taiwan.
The time to celebrate will come when the KMT and President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) deliver all the promises they made during the election campaign. Then we, the people, will let off firecrackers instead of venting disappointment.
Hanna Shen
Taipei
Cuffing potential
The arrest and detention of former president Chen Shui-bian is a joke.
First, in any civilized country, fraud or corruption is a white-collar crime. Was there a need to handcuff Chen, who was head of state just six months ago and who has not been convicted of any crime?
It is ludicrous that the prosecutors’ request to remand Chen in custody was based on their assumption that the former president might tamper with evidence in the bribery case against him. If Chen were guilty, he would have tampered with evidence weeks ago.
Chen is not perfect, but Taiwanese should ask themselves whether it is Chen or Ma who would have been able and willing to stand up and protect Taiwan’s interests at all costs.
The answer is clear: It was Chen.
Jason Lee Boon Hong
Singapore
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS