Hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets to protest against declining living standards last Saturday. On Tuesday, media reports claimed the government was planning to cut the number of foreign workers in response to the protests. The government denied the existence of such a plan on Wednesday, but admitted that key officials were discussing the possibility of cutting foreign workers to help create jobs for locals.
Given the high unemployment rate and feelings of economic uncertainty, if officials continue with empty rhetoric about stimulating domestic demand through consumption, then they are either out of their minds or else trying to emulate Emperor Hui (惠帝) of the Jin Dynasty — remembered for causing great suffering by not understanding the needs of his people.
More than 400,000 foreign workers are employed in Taiwan at this time, crowding out job opportunities for local workers. This is a vicious foreign labor policy bequeathed to us by the former government. But the current government would be insensitive and incompetent if it does not alter it as soon as possible.
Let us look back at the severe oil crisis and global economic downturn that president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) faced in the 1970s. Chiang’s government launched the “10 Major Construction Projects” to enable the unemployed in the low and middle-income categories to find jobs.
Companies also profited from participation in public construction projects and were able to invest in other ventures with the earnings. Since there were no foreign laborers at that time, the capital that the government invested in these projects entirely benefited local workers.
Then, with steady incomes, these workers were able to engage in demand-driven consumption, which covers food, clothing, housing, transportation and entertainment. The economic benefits are even more obvious when viewed in light of the investment multiplier effect.
Today, many college and university students are thrown into a position of unemployment as soon as they graduate, while workers in all age groups are being retrenched in larger numbers. Since it is difficult to find a job at the moment, suicide is increasing among the poor and the sick as a way to escape the hardship of life.
Surprisingly, at the end of July, there were 370,000 foreign laborers here. If we add the 80,000 or so foreign workers who run away from their jobs, we conclude that there are around 450,000 jobs occupied by foreign workers. No wonder countless local workers are forced into unemployment.
For each foreign worker who earns NT$240,000 per year, an average of at least NT$150,000 is remitted to his or her home country. Thus, Taiwan is losing NT$67.5 billion (US$2.1 billion) in domestic disposable income annually. The total loss since Taiwan began to import significant numbers of foreign workers in 1993 is without doubt an enormous figure. This is an example of how a flawed production-consumption mode can adversely affect government policy.
I suggest that the government amend the Labor Standards Law (勞基法) and its foreign labor policy in a timely manner. This would make the private sector more willing to hire local workers and would provide more job opportunities.
With stable jobs and incomes, the public would be more than happy to spend. This would greatly assist in the nation’s economic recovery.
Alex Jeo is a former convener of the social-economic team of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS