Hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets to protest against declining living standards last Saturday. On Tuesday, media reports claimed the government was planning to cut the number of foreign workers in response to the protests. The government denied the existence of such a plan on Wednesday, but admitted that key officials were discussing the possibility of cutting foreign workers to help create jobs for locals.
Given the high unemployment rate and feelings of economic uncertainty, if officials continue with empty rhetoric about stimulating domestic demand through consumption, then they are either out of their minds or else trying to emulate Emperor Hui (惠帝) of the Jin Dynasty — remembered for causing great suffering by not understanding the needs of his people.
More than 400,000 foreign workers are employed in Taiwan at this time, crowding out job opportunities for local workers. This is a vicious foreign labor policy bequeathed to us by the former government. But the current government would be insensitive and incompetent if it does not alter it as soon as possible.
Let us look back at the severe oil crisis and global economic downturn that president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) faced in the 1970s. Chiang’s government launched the “10 Major Construction Projects” to enable the unemployed in the low and middle-income categories to find jobs.
Companies also profited from participation in public construction projects and were able to invest in other ventures with the earnings. Since there were no foreign laborers at that time, the capital that the government invested in these projects entirely benefited local workers.
Then, with steady incomes, these workers were able to engage in demand-driven consumption, which covers food, clothing, housing, transportation and entertainment. The economic benefits are even more obvious when viewed in light of the investment multiplier effect.
Today, many college and university students are thrown into a position of unemployment as soon as they graduate, while workers in all age groups are being retrenched in larger numbers. Since it is difficult to find a job at the moment, suicide is increasing among the poor and the sick as a way to escape the hardship of life.
Surprisingly, at the end of July, there were 370,000 foreign laborers here. If we add the 80,000 or so foreign workers who run away from their jobs, we conclude that there are around 450,000 jobs occupied by foreign workers. No wonder countless local workers are forced into unemployment.
For each foreign worker who earns NT$240,000 per year, an average of at least NT$150,000 is remitted to his or her home country. Thus, Taiwan is losing NT$67.5 billion (US$2.1 billion) in domestic disposable income annually. The total loss since Taiwan began to import significant numbers of foreign workers in 1993 is without doubt an enormous figure. This is an example of how a flawed production-consumption mode can adversely affect government policy.
I suggest that the government amend the Labor Standards Law (勞基法) and its foreign labor policy in a timely manner. This would make the private sector more willing to hire local workers and would provide more job opportunities.
With stable jobs and incomes, the public would be more than happy to spend. This would greatly assist in the nation’s economic recovery.
Alex Jeo is a former convener of the social-economic team of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS