Hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets to protest against declining living standards last Saturday. On Tuesday, media reports claimed the government was planning to cut the number of foreign workers in response to the protests. The government denied the existence of such a plan on Wednesday, but admitted that key officials were discussing the possibility of cutting foreign workers to help create jobs for locals.
Given the high unemployment rate and feelings of economic uncertainty, if officials continue with empty rhetoric about stimulating domestic demand through consumption, then they are either out of their minds or else trying to emulate Emperor Hui (惠帝) of the Jin Dynasty — remembered for causing great suffering by not understanding the needs of his people.
More than 400,000 foreign workers are employed in Taiwan at this time, crowding out job opportunities for local workers. This is a vicious foreign labor policy bequeathed to us by the former government. But the current government would be insensitive and incompetent if it does not alter it as soon as possible.
Let us look back at the severe oil crisis and global economic downturn that president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) faced in the 1970s. Chiang’s government launched the “10 Major Construction Projects” to enable the unemployed in the low and middle-income categories to find jobs.
Companies also profited from participation in public construction projects and were able to invest in other ventures with the earnings. Since there were no foreign laborers at that time, the capital that the government invested in these projects entirely benefited local workers.
Then, with steady incomes, these workers were able to engage in demand-driven consumption, which covers food, clothing, housing, transportation and entertainment. The economic benefits are even more obvious when viewed in light of the investment multiplier effect.
Today, many college and university students are thrown into a position of unemployment as soon as they graduate, while workers in all age groups are being retrenched in larger numbers. Since it is difficult to find a job at the moment, suicide is increasing among the poor and the sick as a way to escape the hardship of life.
Surprisingly, at the end of July, there were 370,000 foreign laborers here. If we add the 80,000 or so foreign workers who run away from their jobs, we conclude that there are around 450,000 jobs occupied by foreign workers. No wonder countless local workers are forced into unemployment.
For each foreign worker who earns NT$240,000 per year, an average of at least NT$150,000 is remitted to his or her home country. Thus, Taiwan is losing NT$67.5 billion (US$2.1 billion) in domestic disposable income annually. The total loss since Taiwan began to import significant numbers of foreign workers in 1993 is without doubt an enormous figure. This is an example of how a flawed production-consumption mode can adversely affect government policy.
I suggest that the government amend the Labor Standards Law (勞基法) and its foreign labor policy in a timely manner. This would make the private sector more willing to hire local workers and would provide more job opportunities.
With stable jobs and incomes, the public would be more than happy to spend. This would greatly assist in the nation’s economic recovery.
Alex Jeo is a former convener of the social-economic team of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Former Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry spoke at the Yushan Forum in Taipei on Monday, saying that while global conflicts were causing economic strife in the world, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) serves as a stabilizing force in the Indo-Pacific region and offers strategic opportunities for small island nations such as Fiji, as well as support in the fields of public health, education, renewable energy and agricultural technology. Taiwan does not have official diplomatic relations with Fiji, but it is one of the small island nations covered by the NSP. Chaudhry said that Fiji, as a sovereign nation, should support
RSS