While the upcoming visit of China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) for the second round of talks with Straits Exchange Foundation Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) may seem focused on economic issues, we must remember that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is a political creature and that the talks will have undertones that will be aimed at damaging Taiwan’s sovereignty.
Many Taiwanese strongly oppose signing any agreement with China resembling the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA) that Hong Kong signed in 2003.
In 2003, the SARS epidemic spread from China to Hong Kong. Many people died and Hong Kong’s economy was hurt. Then-Hong Kong chief executive Tung Chee-hwa (董建華) was criticized as incompetent for relying on China and its economy to solve Hong Kong’s problems. Almost 1 million people took to the streets in protest.
Following this, China eased restrictions on its nationals traveling to Hong Kong in the name of injecting life into Hong Kong’s retail industry. The government painted this as a panacea for Hong Kong’s economic problems and, as a result, the government neglected transforming the structure of industry in Hong Kong. The result was that Hong Kong became overly dependent on China, and when global financial worries started and China’s economy began to slip, Hong Kong’s economy had hardly any life left in it at all.
The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and other academics released a joint study entitled the Global Urban Competitiveness Report 2008-2009 in July. Hong Kong ranked 26th in terms of overall competitiveness among other cities in the world — a drop of eight places compared with two years ago. The academy is a think tank for the CCP and if this is what they are saying, how can the present administration’s economists still be willing to sacrifice Taiwan by placing all their hopes in China?
An over-reliance on China caused inflation to rise in Hong Kong as the price of goods in China increased. In July, Hong Kong’s inflation rate was 6.3 percent, the highest in 11 years, with Hong Kong Chief Executive Donald Tsang (曾蔭權) saying that high rates will continue until next fall. Real income in Hong Kong is also dropping and Hong Kong’s stock market has plummeted as markets in the US and China have fallen.
Chinese company stocks account for half the total value of Hong Kong’s bourse and the Hang Seng index finished about two-thirds lower than average several days ago after the Chinese stock market fell 7.2 points. Stocks in Chinese companies have now become a hindrance to Hong Kong’s stock market and are definitely not a panacea for Hong Kong’s economic woes.
Hong Kong’s media has reported a struggling real estate market, slow business and record unemployment rates.Many enterprises have gone bust and Hong Kong-backed businesses in China have also experienced trouble. Federation of Hong Kong Industries chairman Clement Chen (陳鎮仁) has said there are almost 70,000 businesses in China’s Pearl River Delta that are backed by Hong Kong investors and one-quarter of these are expected to go out of business before the Lunar New Year.
Renowned Hong Kong-based economist and long-time believer in the Chinese economy Steven Cheung (張五常) said last Friday that the Chinese economy would experience negative growth if Beijing fails to take timely remedial action. If negative growth does occur, Hong Kong will certainly be affected.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his economists should be paying close attention.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) has said that the armed forces must reach a high level of combat readiness by 2027. That date was not simply picked out of a hat. It has been bandied around since 2021, and was mentioned most recently by US Senator John Cornyn during a question to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday. It first surfaced during a hearing in the US in 2021, when then-US Navy admiral Philip Davidson, who was head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said: “The threat [of military
RSS