The mood inside the bus is grave. It is just before 3am. The passengers — burdened with suitcases, cardboard boxes, cloth bundles and flasks of green tea — have the air of prisoners of war being transported to an uncertain fate.
“When you’re on the bus, you don’t talk with the people you don’t know in case they’re with the Taliban,” said 19-year-old Asadullah, an electronic spare parts dealer who, like many Afghans, uses only one name.
Asadullah and his fellow 55 passengers are taking a ride along the 483km highway that many believe is the most dangerous stretch of road on the planet. Linking Kandahar and Kabul — Afghanistan’s two largest and most economically vital cities — and completed almost five years ago, the road was meant to open a gateway to economic development and improve the quality of life for Afghans.
The US State Department touted the US$190 million project as “the most visible sign of America’s post-war reconstruction” in Afghanistan.
But today the road is a symbol of instability across the country, the failure of government and international security forces to maintain law and order, and the increasing presence of the Taliban.
Government and military officials say insurgents and bandits regularly pull travelers from their vehicles, murdering or kidnapping them for ransom. Corrupt government security forces seek bribes and collaborate with insurgents and robbers. Roadside bombs frequently target Afghan police and military patrols, along with NATO convoys. No one in an official capacity can even quantify the violence.
“I have to take these risks,” said Asadullah, who makes the treacherous journey between Kabul and Kandahar once a month. “I have to make money to buy food for my family.”
Afghans unable to afford the US$100 one-way airfare between Kabul and Kandahar pay an average of US$6 for the bus ride. They hope the bus will be safer than traveling in private vehicles, which are favored targets of the Taliban and highwaymen.
Responsibility for security along the highway initially was handed to Afghanistan’s national police, but shortages of men and weaponry, and the recent increase in violence along the road have forced the government to deploy military units as reinforcements. The road is littered with burned-out green police pick-up trucks, 4x4 vehicles, NATO supply trucks and demolished bridges.
Afghan General Abdul Alim Kohistani, the regional police commander who oversees the territory, said he has 180 men to man the 14 checkpoints along the route. He said that he needs at least 320 more officers and heavier firepower to provide adequate security.
“The Taliban has RPGs [rocket propelled grenades] and mortars. How can we fight them when we only have PKs, AK-47s and fewer men?” Kohistani asked, referring to the machine guns and rifles his men carry. “We want to take control of this highway and show the world and the Afghan people that we are capable of doing this.”
The army now has a base near the midpoint between Kabul and Kandahar and has established 15 checkpoints with at least 40 to 50 soldiers at each one.
Afghan Defense Ministry Spokesman General Zaher Azimi said that manning checkpoints on the highway is a policing job and the army is already hard-pressed with other duties.
But the military has no alternative because “instability is increasing day-by-day.”
While careful not to criticize the police force, Azimi says if he were in charge of security along the highway he would “pursue the insurgents into the surrounding areas off the road to capture or push them as far back as possible.”
Faizullah, president of Abduli International Transport, said Taliban operatives regularly call his office and ask who has bought tickets.
“They’re looking for foreigners and people working with the government,” Faizullah said. “We tell them we only sell tickets to normal Afghan civilians.”
That doesn’t prevent the Taliban from frequently stopping and boarding buses along the highway, drivers and passengers say.
“They search and question everyone on the bus,” 35-year-old driver Agha Mohammed said. “Sometimes they take two or three people off.”
Drivers tend to hurtle their buses down the narrow two-lane road, rarely voluntarily stopping for passengers. Despite their efforts to keep moving, the drivers said they have no choice when the Taliban appear.
“I must stop or they’ll start shooting,” said 34-year-old Toryalai, who drives between Kabul and Kandahar four times a week for the Abduli bus line and earns the equivalent of about US$140 a month.
In another show of force, the Taliban have coerced mobile phone companies to shut down their signals along the highway at night after fulfilling threats to start destroying communication towers in the region, said Roshad, an employee of one of the firms.
In a sandy, pockmarked terminal in Kabul later that morning, the relieved group disembarks.
“It was a good trip,” says Abdul Nabi, 36, a trader who was visiting family, as he whisked away his wife and four children. “We arrived in one piece.”
There has been much catastrophizing in Taiwan recently about America becoming more unreliable as a bulwark against Chinese pressure. Some of this has been sparked by debates in Washington about whether the United States should defend Taiwan in event of conflict. There also were understandable anxieties about whether President Trump would sacrifice Taiwan’s interests for a trade deal when he sat down with President Xi (習近平) in late October. On top of that, Taiwan’s opposition political leaders have sought to score political points by attacking the Lai (賴清德) administration for mishandling relations with the United States. Part of this budding anxiety
The diplomatic dispute between China and Japan over Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s comments in the Japanese Diet continues to escalate. In a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, China’s UN Ambassador Fu Cong (傅聰) wrote that, “if Japan dares to attempt an armed intervention in the cross-Strait situation, it would be an act of aggression.” There was no indication that Fu was aware of the irony implicit in the complaint. Until this point, Beijing had limited its remonstrations to diplomatic summonses and weaponization of economic levers, such as banning Japanese seafood imports, discouraging Chinese from traveling to Japan or issuing
On Nov. 8, newly elected Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) and Vice Chairman Chi Lin-len (季麟連) attended a memorial for White Terror era victims, during which convicted Chinese Communist Party (CCP) spies such as Wu Shi (吳石) were also honored. Cheng’s participation in the ceremony, which she said was part of her efforts to promote cross-strait reconciliation, has trapped herself and her party into the KMT’s dark past, and risks putting the party back on its old disastrous road. Wu, a lieutenant general who was the Ministry of National Defense’s deputy chief of the general staff, was recruited
Tokyo-Beijing relations have been rapidly deteriorating over the past two weeks as China tries to punish Japan over Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks about Taiwan earlier this month, and the off-ramp to this conflict is yet to be seen. Takaichi saying that a “Taiwan contingency” could cause a “situation threatening Japan’s survival” — which would allow Japan to act in self-defense — has drawn Beijing’s ire and sparked retaliatory measures. Her remark did not gain public attention until Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) made an apparent threat to behead her. The two sides lodged protests against each
RSS