A pioneering Chinese company is to market pasteurized Tibetan yak milk in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou in the hope that it will become a new super-food in the world’s most populous country.
At 24 yuan (US$3.50) for a 250ml carton, Feifan — meaning “uncommonly good” — costs several times as much as cow’s milk.
“It’s very natural, green, pure and high-quality. That’s our big selling point — we aim at the high-end market,” said Ding Pengcheng of the Treasure of the Plateau Yak Milk Company.
Over the next three years, the firm is to spend millions to crack the domestic and international markets, with the help of state investment. Yaks produce fewer than 300 liters of milk a year, while cows yield 35 times as much. The firm pays Tibetan farmers 16 yuan or more per liter, eight times the price of standard milk.
The China Nutrition Society, a Ministry of Health-backed research institute, claims the amino acids, calcium and vitamin A in yak milk are considerably higher than in cow’s milk, though its appeal depends as much on the mystique of its origins as its nutritional qualities. Feifan is undergoing extra safety checks because of China’s recent milk contamination scandal. Yet in the long run such concerns could boost the desire for products that combine modern hygiene with unsullied, back-to-the-land imagery.
Tsering Droma is a typical Tibetan herder who can now look forward to tapping the Chinese market. Born into a herding family, she tends 30 yaks on steep slopes near the Karola pass.
The animals are central to Tibetan culture. Their butter is melted into tea and fuels the lamps that light monasteries. Dung keeps fires burning; bones are carved into beads. Yaks provide Droma and her family with everything they need.
“Female yaks are very important to us: We can get milk, make butter and cheese and get extra money by selling it. For the males, they can be used for transport,” she said. “We can sell the yak skins and the meat and hair. All the parts can be sold. Then we buy things like grain.”
But 160km away in Lhasa, the Treasure of the Plateau company is transforming this hand-to-mouth livelihood into a serious business. It is marketing the traditional staple as a super-food for aspirational middle-class households across China and beyond.
Steam seeps from the pipes of its Tetrapak production line as it heats liter after liter of milk to 130°C.
In 2003, the firm sold just over 2 million yuan in goods; this year it is on course to bring in up to 90 million yuan. Each day the local market consumes between 3 tonnes and 6 tonnes of its yogurt.
The company’s first batches of milk arrived in bowls carried on herders’ backs, and often with the unwelcome additions of insects and yak hair.
Now they come in clean containers, usually delivered by motorbike or car — proof, the company says, that it is raising local incomes.
That does not make it immune from controversy surrounding economic development. Its expansion into markets around China would be all but impossible without the Tibet-Qinghai rail line, which critics say has damaged the environment and accelerated the erosion of Tibetan culture. Seventy percent of the firm’s 110 staff are Tibetan, but only a few are in senior posts.
“Our company carries out a lot of training for our Tibetan staff, but most of them don’t have higher, college-level education,” Ding said.
At the least, the company and the government money behind it are supporting long-impoverished herders. The authorities have been heavily criticized for forcibly settling nomads. But this state investment is helping some to increase their incomes without having to abandon their heritage.
It is what officials call “development with Tibetan characteristics.” And yaks are as Tibetan as they come.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath