While news about the imports of melamine-contaminated milk powder produced by the Sanlu Group and 21 other Chinese companies and tainted powdered non-dairy creamer manufactured in Shandong Province caused a panic in Taiwan, the Council of Agriculture said last Monday that 18 brands of locally produced fresh milk and raw milk were all safe and melamine-free. The announcement came as an unexpected ray of light amid public fears over dairy products. It revived consumer confidence in food safety and showed that safe products are made in Taiwan by Taiwanese companies.
The logo “Made in Taiwan (MIT)” has never drawn as much attention as it does now. Twenty years ago, this brand was seen as a name for cheap products, but it has since experienced splendid times thanks to Taiwan’s leading role in the electronic original equipment manufacturing industry. However, as we all have become dependent on guarantees of food safety, it would be well worth our while to initiate a meaningful civil campaign — “I love MIT.”
The scandal over tainted Chinese milk powder is not only a problem of managing the cross-strait trade in food products but an international problem because of the globalization of food production.
Not only did the US and Canada immediately ban all dairy product imports from China, but the WHO publicly denounced China for failing to alert the international community sooner and admit that the situation could be more serious than originally thought.
Almost all Chinese dairy products containing animal or plant protein have been affected. Concerns have been aroused that Chinese processed food products that have been sold to every part of the world such as cookies, cakes, pudding, candies and instant coffee may also have been tainted. This is why all countries are on the alert.
Taiwan’s government, which has placed high priority on the improvement of its political and economic relations with China, was panned for its slow handling of the crisis.
It is now taking belated precautions by replacing the head of the Department of Health, examining gaps in food management regulations and investigating the failure to fully implement source of origin labeling.
But the government should consider the issue from a wider perspective, thinking about how to take advantage of the current situation to revive the local traditional food sector.
The public should learn from the toxic milk powder incident that it is a glaring mistake to decide whether an industry is of significance simply by looking at output value. Pinning all our hopes on the electronics sector and high-tech industries is not enough to bring peace and prosperity to the public. The government should immediately consider how to extend capital, human resources and technological support.
Concrete actions could include the Ministry of Economic Affairs allocating more resources toward technological development and research projects for the food and textile industries in order to advance their technologies and encourage them to build their own brands and enhancing their marketing skills. The Industrial Technology Research Institute should also lead experts in giving more assistance to traditional industries.
In terms of improving the managerial environment of the traditional sector, the government should, if necessary, not be afraid of leveling anti-dumping charges under international law against a large number of cheap Chinese and Vietnamese products imported under the WTO framework.
It should not hesitate to take action because it fears compromising trade relations with China.
A good example of the need for such action was the importing of Chinese cheap towels that disrupted local markets and caused substantive damage to Yunlin County towel makers in 2006.
Finally, regulations about source of origin labeling and declarations of ingredients on Chinese food products are not strict enough. The main reason for this problem is that many major Taiwanese companies have established factories in China to reduce costs and then sell their products back to Taiwan. These vested interest groups are an impediment to legislation and law enforcement.
To protect public safety and health, the government must eliminate undue intervention and lay down clear regulations requiring that the origin of ingredients be shown on the labels of processed products. To make possible strict controls, it should also charge importers with the responsibility to control product flows and levy appropriate fines for failing to do so.
Most importantly, low prices are the only incentive to buy Chinese. With the gloomy economy and rising commodity prices, company management and consumer behavior have been changing. The public should urge the government to adopt effective measures to boost the economy and control consumer prices.
However, the public should also support locally produced products to help domestic companies and promote “Made in Taiwan” products.
As Taiwan developed from a poor nation to a wealthy one, from a coarse one to an advanced one, it has built its own brand. Following the Chinese toxic milk powder scare, it is clear that Taiwan-made products were successful because they had no Chinese ingredients; they are “China-free.”
The lesson to be drawn is simple in its profundity: MIT is the best guarantee for TaiwaAn remaining at ease and secure.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS