Under the “wise” rule of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), Taiwan is looking increasingly less like a country.
A few days ago, the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) held talks with China-based Taiwanese businesspeople. During the meeting, the head of the Taiwan Business Association requested that the government allow Taiwanese businesspeople to hold positions in the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) to increase their say on China’s government policy and help protect their rights and interests in China.
Giving in to such a demand, however, would irrevocably destroy Taiwan as a nation.
Nevertheless, Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Chairwoman Lai Shin-yuan (賴幸媛) said that the provincial and municipal levels of the CPPCC were not as politically sensitive as other Chinese government posts and that her council would look into the issue to see if the law leaves room for interpretation.
She also said she hoped it would be possible to relax regulations to let Taiwanese businesspeople achieve some measure of political power in China.
Xinhua news agency recently reported that Taiwanese businesspeople had complained to Ma about not being allowed to become CPPCC members, telling him they hoped the law could change and that Ma had said the idea was a good one that would be a breakthrough in protecting the rights and interests of Taiwanese businesspeople.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Kuo Su-chun (郭素春) and his colleagues are planning to push for the required amendments in the legislature.
But a Presidential Office spokesperson said Ma had only told the businesspeople that the MAC would look into the matter of low-level CPPCC membership.
This is evidence that the Ma administration already has decided that it wants Taiwanese businesspeople to become CPPCC members. Restricting such membership to provincial and municipal levels would be just the first step.
Beijing views Taiwan as part of China. In reality, Taiwan is a country separate from China, a fact that is clear to many people around the world.
Yet after taking office, Ma said Taiwan and China belong to the same China and that “the relations between Taiwan and China are not state to state relations.” These comments rob Taiwan of its national sovereignty.
Now Ma wants to go one step further by amending the law to make Taiwan even more like the “Taiwan Area of China.”
The Act Governing Relations Between Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (兩岸人民關係條例) states: “Any individual, juristic person, organization or other institution of the Taiwan Area shall not hold any position or become any member of the agencies, institutions or organizations of the Mainland Area which are political parties, the military, the administration or of any political nature.”
This law should be strictly enforced to avoid any confusion over national identity. It is hard to believe that the president is even contemplating loosening these restrictions.
Just what is the Ma government thinking? Surely it cannot believe that its moves toward integrating Taiwan’s economy with China’s unification plans are too slow.
Typhoon Sinlaku caused great destruction in Taiwan. The stock market continues to drop and the global financial crisis has caused Taiwan’s economy to suffer immensely. The UN General Assembly has denied a request by Taiwan to participate in the activities of its agencies. Taiwan’s woes appear to grow daily.
Everyone is hoping that the government can do something to ease his or her troubles. However, Ma and his government are not interested in solving them. They are focused on helping Taiwanese businesspeople join the Chinese government.
Using a time when a nation is gripped by natural and economic disaster to brazenly sell off its sovereignty is disgusting. Their attitude only makes it easier for China to push its plan to erase Taiwan from the international community. What will the international community think if Taiwan continues to be unable to join the UN while its businesspeople join the CPPCC.
Taiwanese must not be allowed to hold a position in the CPPCC or any other Chinese Communist Party organization, nor should they be allowed to take up positions or become members in any Chinese military, administrative or political organization. This is essential to Taiwan’s sovereignty.
If a single Taiwanese becomes a member of any such organization, China will invite more Taiwanese to join its fold in an effort to show the world that Taiwan has “returned to the embrace of the motherland.”
Taiwan’s sovereignty crisis is not something that may happen in the future or something to be talked about in the future tense. It is happening right now.
The people of Taiwan need to wake up and take effective action to protect their sovereignty. Otherwise, it could turn out to be difficult to hold a presidential election here in four years’ time.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength