Plans to build a 4.7km expressway from Tamsui to Taipei made headlines again last week as the Taipei County Government held a public meeting to pacify residents and environmentalists vehemently opposed to the project.
If realized, the Tanbei Expressway would run along the Tamsui River — at its closest only 2m from protected mangrove swamps — and the highly popular bike path that many Taipei residents enjoy as a nearby green getaway from the sights and sounds of the city.
County officials have repeatedly tried to allay public concerns over the planned road — in all the wrong ways. Rather than addressing the potential impact of this project on the environment and the high costs involved, the county government has served up euphemisms and transparent rationalizations.
The government has classified the Tanbei Expressway as a “flat road,” even though 2.2km of it would be elevated, to avoid the “expressway” label. It claims the expressway would be temporary and an alternative route to the congested Provincial Highway 2, providing a speedier thoroughfare for emergency traffic such as ambulances, as well as commuters.
In reality, media reports indicate that the county government offered that rationale only after residents began urging authorities to deal with heavy traffic on Provincial Highway 2. The idea that the NT$3.8 billion (US$119.2 million) expressway would be a temporary measure to deal with that traffic is laughable.
The plot thickened in July, when, after concerns were raised that the expressway would plough through an archeological site, the county government sent out letters announcing that construction on the project would begin this year.
The Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) quoted Taipei County Commissioner Chou Hsi-wei (周錫瑋) as saying the project would begin “even if it is illegal.”
It may come as a shock that a plan threatening a unique ecological system and archeological site, and likely to exacerbate flooding and erosion in the area, could soon begin without real scrutiny.
The contentious Suhua Freeway has undergone a decade of environmental impact assessments (EIA) because of concerns that damage to the environment would outweigh the benefits of the road.
The Tanbei Expressway, however, neatly skirts this problem by staying under the 5km threshold, above which planned roads must apply for EIAs. The prospect that this project could threaten the Tamsui River’s mangroves as the Environmental Protection Administration stands idly by is yet another example of that agency’s impotence.
Likewise, it is to the discredit of the county government that concerns about erosion have not slowed the planning process. Following heavy rains and widespread flooding this year, a public outcry drew attention to the tragic ramifications of unwise construction projects and inadequate flood-prevention measures along waterways. In response, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) toured dredging projects and early last month asked Chou to draw up a comprehensive plan to address flooding in his county.
Both county and central government authorities must look into the raft of complaints about this project. However, expressway opponents must not be deterred by Chou’s blatant disregard of their concerns or the law. They should continue to raise questions, even if no one in authority wants to provide an answer.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS