While invading Russian tanks lumbered into Georgia last month, crowds in Beijing were pouring into Olympic venues in a globally televised show of international engagement.
The contrasting images may yield a diplomatic boon for China, one that could bring real advantages in its rise to global prominence. While both Russia and China rank as newly assertive global giants, China — even with its surging foreign trade, booming military spending and growing international reach — looks practically benign compared with an angry, aggressive Russia, experts say.
“You can’t help noting the imagery,” said Bobo Lo, director of Russia and China programs at the Center for European Reform in London. “It seems to be a contrast that works in China’s favor.”
China could certainly use the boost. Fears over its economic rise, widespread unrest in Tibet and chaos surrounding the Olympic torch relay combined to dent Beijing’s image abroad this year.
Since then, praise for the Beijing Games and May’s devastating earthquake in Sichuan Province have helped moderate the criticism, establishing positive momentum that flattering comparisons with Russia should help sustain.
In material terms, China stands to gain most from closer relations with Central Asia, a region that remains wary of Russian intentions and where Beijing is investing heavily in hopes of securing access to oil and gas.
It could also bring about closer ties with the US and Europe, who have criticized Russia’s recent moves and are now reevaluating their overall relationship with Moscow.
“While Russia looks like a grasping, combative power, China appears to be engaging” with the outside world, Lo said. “Beijing doesn’t want to foul up ties with Russia but relations with the US are much more important.”
Achieving that balance requires an exceptionally cautious response.
On Tuesday, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu (姜瑜) offered up only a bland statement on the situation and ignored a question about Moscow’s recent warning to the international community not to support Georgia’s leadership and call for an arms embargo against the ex-Soviet republic.
“We hope relevant countries and relevant parties continue their efforts through dialogue and consultation to ease the situation and find a proper resolution for regional peace and stability,” Jiang said at a regular news conference.
Earlier, the ministry said it was concerned about the situation in Georgia, but offered no specifics. Last week, China joined Central Asian states in ignoring Russia’s plea for an endorsement of its diplomatic recognition of two Moscow-backed separatist enclaves in Georgia.
“Beijing’s policy so far, such as it is, is what one can describe [as] ‘masterly inactivity’ — do as little as possible, not antagonize anyone, but not support anyone either,” said Steve Tsang (曾銳生), a China expert at Oxford University.
Despite frequently partnering with Russia to contain US influence, Beijing has plenty of reasons for quietly opposing Moscow’s Georgia agenda.
Moscow’s recognition of the rebel regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia has tweaked Chinese anxieties about independence movements in its restive western regions of Tibet and Xinjiang, as well as Taiwan, said June Teufel Dreyer, a Chinese politics expert at the University of Florida.
“The implications of recognizing South Ossetia and Abkhazia set dangerous precedents,” Dreyer said.
Moscow’s actions also encroach on China’s consistent hard line over questions of sovereignty and territorial integrity and firm opposition to military intervention on humanitarian grounds.
Russia’s attempts to cast its dispatch of troops to Georgia along the lines of Western intervention in Kosovo have little currency in Beijing, Tsang said.
China also objected to Russia’s attempt to use a Chinese-dominated regional body, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), to endorse its recognition of the rebel Georgian regions, Tsang said. Beijing has always insisted the grouping, which met last week in Tajikistan, is not a political alliance and does not pose a threat to any other nation or multilateral institution.
“It’s not meant to rebuke Russia as much as it is to show the world that the SCO under Chinese stewardship is a constructive force,” Tsang said.
Russian assertiveness also helps China by fragmenting US and EU concerns over its own rise while heading off future “color revolutions” that brought democrats to power in Georgia and Ukraine, Tsang said.
Both, he said, are “very welcome developments that China would not like to undermine.”
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS