THE QUESTION OF whether the Beijing Olympics can be compared to the 1936 Berlin Olympics has recently become a popular topic of conversation. Watching the opening ceremony, where renowned Chinese director Zhang Yimou (張藝謀) mobilized a large number of performers to extol ancient Chinese culture, it was hard not to think of the well-known documentary Leni Riefenstahl made about the Berlin Olympics.
Certainly, anyone comparing the Beijing Olympics with the Berlin Olympics is not doing so out of good will to Beijing. After all, Hitler used the Berlin Olympics, where Germany grabbed the most gold medals, to furbish the reputation of the Nazis before launching what developed into World War II. Those who loathe China have rushed to compare these two Olympic events, while those who support it have denounced such comparisons as meaningless.
Speaking of the Berlin Olympics, a competitor who is neither Taiwanese nor Chinese comes to mind — Sohn Kee-chung, the first Korean to win an Olympic gold at the Berlin Olympics marathon. Korea was then occupied by Japan, so Sohn represented Japan at the event. However, when the Japanese flag was raised at the awarding eremony, he hid the Japanese flag on his shirt with a laurel awarded as part of the ceremony. Sohn made it clear during an interview that Korea was his home country. This made him a Korean national hero, and he was the one who carried the Olympic torch at the 1988 Seoul Olympics.
What does this Korean national hero have to do with Taiwan? I was born in the 1960s and Sohn’s story was included in elementary textbooks then. The story was introduced in Taiwan because the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government hoped that the Taiwanese, who had also been colonized by Japan, would emulate Sohn’s national consciousness and cast off the shadow of Japanese colonialism to become full and dignified Republic of China nationals.
This story appears rather embarrassing in the context of the Beijing Olympics. The national title, “Republic of China,” is all but invisible and Taiwanese athletes can only be “full and dignified” representatives of Zhonghua Taibei (中華台北, Chinese Taipei).
Some supporters of the old party-state regime have called on Taiwanese athletes to follow the example of Sohn by displaying Taiwan’s “real flag” if they win. It is ironic then to see top-ranking leaders of the KMT — the party that established the old party-state system — shaking hands with Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and telling the Taiwanese public that Taiwan has the “home advantage” in Beijing. This makes one wonder which national flag the athletes should display when they win a medal.
The spirit of nationalism abounds in this type of sporting event, where countries compete with one another. But with Taiwan still confused over its own national identity, what type of nationalism should it display — Taiwanese or Chinese? This is the tragedy of Taiwan.
Wang Yu-fong is a director of the North Pingtung Community College.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS