In The First Circle, Alexander Solzhenitsyn has political prisoners in Josef Stalin’s gulag tell a story about Moscow’s hellish Butyrka prison. One day, a young captain takes the emaciated inmates of cell 72 to a version of paradise. Barbers spray them with eau de Cologne, laundresses dress them in silk and chefs provide them with their first decent meal in years. When they go back, they find the authorities have painted their cell in bright colors. Previously forbidden books and packets of cigarettes are scattered around the room. In place of the huge slop bucket is a gleaming toilet.
The prisoners cannot understand their good fortune until the guards usher in a “Mrs. R,” an American “lady of great shrewdness and progressive views,” who is clearly meant to be Eleanor Roosevelt. The governor tells her that they are not dissidents but rapists and murderers whom the Communist Party in its magnanimity has decided to rehabilitate rather than execute. She does not ask to inspect any of the other cells and leaves, “convinced of the falsehood of the allegations spread by malicious scaremongers in the West.”
As soon as she has gone, the prisoners’ lice-infested rags and slop bucket return.
The Chinese Communist Party has beautified Beijing for the Olympics. The Organizing Committee for the games has ordered 1 million cars from the road and told factories to shut down so foreigners will believe that one of the most polluted cities on earth can hold “the green Olympics.”
The president of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) gabbled his appreciation. Jacques Rogge, a sports bureaucrat who appears to have learned nothing from the 20th century, lauded China’s “extraordinary” efforts. The statistics proved the authorities had done everything that “was humanely possible,” and the statistics never lie.
Greenpeace, so harsh on democratic countries, was as excessive in its praise. After registering a few reservations, it declared the dictatorship’s work was “tremendous” and “positively unique,” Beijing was providing “important lessons to other Chinese cities.”
The eyebrows of Jonathan Fenby, who has just published The Penguin History of Modern China, shot up at that. When the Games are over, the factories will reopen, he said. The Olympics will have secured a few long-term benefits — more homes and workplaces will burn gas rather than coal — but when set against China’s vast pollution problem these gains will be tiny.
As every serious writer knows, the legitimacy of the dictatorship rests on its ability to deliver ever-rising living standards now that its Marxism is dead. Environmental concerns will always be trumped by the party’s survival instinct.
Thus Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) reverses a program to close coal mines. He has to, an official tells Der Spiegel, because China’s inefficient industries “need seven times the resources of Japan, almost six times the resources of the US and almost three times the resources used by India.” Thus, when the leaders of the G8 announce a wish to halve greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, Hu and India’s leaders see a plot by the rich West to handicap Asian rivals and refuse to accept the target.
Because the communism of Stalin and Mao Zedong (毛澤東) is dead, however, the scale of the catastrophe need not be a secret circulated only in samizdat pamphlets.
There are voices within China free to argue that the country is ignoring her own as well as the world’s long-term interests. Vice Minister of the State Environmental Protection Administration Pan Yue (潘岳) warned in 2005 that the economic miracle “will end soon because the environment can no longer keep pace,” and he had the evidence to back up his claim.
China has 16 of the world’s 20 filthiest cities. The Gobi desert is expanding at a rate of 4,921km² a year because of deforestation and over-farming. Approximately 660 cities have less water than they need and 110 of them suffer severe shortages. The Xinhua news agency reports that pollution is poisoning the aquifers. Eighty percent of the sewage dumped into the Yangtze is untreated. Effluent, human and industrial, has driven one-third of the native species of the Yellow River to extinction. About 190 million Chinese are sick from drinking contaminated water, cancer rates are rising and there are about 1,000 demonstrations a week against the effects of pollution.
The gullible admire dictatorships because they think the great leader and his politburo can cut through objections and force the recalcitrant to obey orders, and we have had no shortage of fantasies about the better China that would come if only the party embraced greenery.
In The River Runs Black, a book every environmentalist needs to read, Elizabeth Economy points out that the fantasies can never be realized. Even if the center wanted to change policy, its writ does not run in the provinces. Local officials are in the pocket of or related to factory owners and ignore inconvenient decrees. If the courts, the press or doctors in local hospitals complain, they silence them. Change is impossible without democratic reform — which is as far away as ever.
Solzhenitsyn’s Mrs. R was incapable of believing the worst and preferred to live in a daydream. Stalin’s goons did not need to fool her because she had already fooled herself.
Today it is just about possible to imagine rich, post-industrial societies switching to renewable energy and nuclear power, although optimists should note the US Republicans’ success in using Senator Barack Obama’s refusal to allow offshore oil drilling against him. But it is inconceivable that the emerging powers of China and India will abandon fossil fuels when there are no cheap options.
Rather than despair, not only the IOC and Greenpeace but also Western governments and the EU pretend that the Potemkin Olympic village in Beijing heralds a new China, and miss the blackened rivers and skies beyond.
As the planet warms, I’m damned if I can see an alternative to despair, but I do know that wishful thinking isn’t it.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS