The many and deepening cuts at newspapers across the US are starting to take a toll on their content, a study released last Monday showed.
The challenge newspapers must meet immediately is to find more revenue on the Internet, according to the Project for Excellence in Journalism’s (PEJ) study, called The Changing Newsroom: What is Being Gained and What is Being Lost in America’s Daily Newspapers.
Newspaper managers need to “find a way to monetize the rapid growth of Web readership before newsroom staff cuts so weaken newspapers that their competitive advantage disappears,” the study said.
Stories are shorter overall, the study found, and staff coverage tends to focus on local and community news.
“America’s newspapers are narrowing their reach and their ambitions and becoming niche reads,” the study said.
Even when foreign and national news makes it into the papers, it is being relegated to less prominent pages.
“To make the front page, it has to be a significant development or a story that we can see through Florida eyes,’’ said Sharon Rosenhause, managing editor of the Fort Lauderdale-based South Florida Sun-Sentinel and a longtime newspaper executive.
The reasons for the newsroom cutbacks are well known: Newsprint costs have jumped and advertising and circulation revenue have quickened their descent this year as advertisers follow readers online. Newspaper Web sites capture only a small fraction of the revenue lost as they sell fewer print ads, which fetch more money.
“The seams and threads are beginning to show in US journalism even though newspapers are by far the greatest source of news,” Lou Ureneck, chairman of the journalism department at Boston University, said on July18.
The PEJ study surveyed senior newsroom executives at more than 250 newspapers and interviewed editors at papers in 15 cities to document the way these cuts have affected newsrooms and the quality of their product.
The results show that papers carry fewer stories on foreign and national news and devote less space to business, science and arts reporting and many have reduced the crossword puzzle and eliminated television and stock listings.
Many editors said they must ask reporters to cover more beats, reducing their ability to produce authoritative stories.
Others said, in what may create a vicious circle, that staff cutbacks reduced their ability to shape coverage to fit their communities’ needs, while Ureneck said that coverage was shrinking.
“This is a strategic move not driven by lack of demand but [by] a revenue model that is broken,” Ureneck said.
Still, 56 percent of the editors surveyed felt their news product was better than it was three years ago because coverage was more targeted.
“There’s an improvement in enterprise, in investigations and in the coverage of several core beats,” the study quoted an unnamed editor of a large metropolitan daily talking about his staff’s coverage, not the makeup of the paper overall.
Local news is “very essential” to their product, 97 percent of editors surveyed said, and they said that’s where they’re putting a larger share of their shrinking resources.
“They are giving a greater piece of a smaller pie to local news,” Ureneck said.
That makes sense because where they can “develop the most expertise and strongest bond with readers is covering the local community.”
The newsroom is much younger than it was three years ago and the reporters are more technology savvy and able to meet the demands of print and online stories, the study found.
Editors once leery of producing content for the Web are increasingly embracing its potential to diversify readership and improve journalism, even if it sometimes saps print resources.
“Editors feel torn between the advantages the Web offers and the energy it consumes to produce material often of limited or even questionable value,” the study said.
The Web speeds delivery of news, allows interaction with readers and opens nearly infinite space for news.
“The downside is that is has eroded the advertising base in print publications and that is by far the main source of revenue to pay for large news staffs,” Ureneck said.
Editors see the ability to track readership of any specific story online as an advantage for improving content.
It provides an “indisputable link between strong editorial content and the kind of higher readership that attracts advertisers,” the study said.
The editors, 97 percent of whom said they are active in trying to develop new revenue streams, can then convince the advertising sales staff to become more targeted in selling to the Web.
Many said, though, that they were uncertain improved editorial content would ensure a bright future — especially since most organizations failed to anticipate the changes that have wracked newsrooms in recent years.
Only 5 percent of the editors surveyed said they were confident they could predict what the newsroom would look like in five years.
“I feel I’m being catapulted into another world, a world I don’t really understand,” Virginian-Pilot editor Denis Finley said in the study. “Things are happening at the speed of light.”
The results of the survey, conducted online by Princeton Survey Research Associates International between Jan. 29 and Feb. 29, include responses from more than 50 percent of US papers with 100,000 or more in circulation and more than 30 percent of papers with 50,000 to 100,000 in circulation.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing