Media reports have said that Tropical Storm Kalmaegi caused serious flooding and landslides. The death toll rose to 20 and six were missing as of Tuesday, while hundreds of thousands of households suffered blackouts or a suspension of water supply, not to mention the massive agricultural loss. I can’t help but wonder what was the cause of these losses.
Some blame it on the Central Weather Bureau’s inadequate forecasts. But it’s unfair to blame everything on the bureau. The government’s and public’s lack of disaster prevention and relief awareness is another factor. In addition to global warming and natural factors, there are at least four manmade or systemic flaws.
First: ineffective soil and water conservation. Poor soil and water conservation and river mismanagement are major causes of the flooding. Most people pay attention to disaster prevention and relief work, and don’t consider the fundamental problem of soil and water, which is the responsibility of the Soil and Water Bureau and the River Management Office.
The division as well as integration of labor between government offices have been problematic issues. For example, many people are unaware of the division of responsibilities for river management, and the media also pay little attention to coordination issues, which also involve issues that cross ministries.
Soil and water conservation is also related to the Forestry Bureau and the Ministry of the Interior’s Construction and Planning Agency. Since authority is unclear, soil and water conservation can’t be effectively implemented.
As these are often mid or long-term issues, it is difficult to notice them, but as soon as a problem occurs, it becomes a hot potato. Meanwhile, these overlapping or gray areas are related to land use along rivers that are the responsibility of local governments, which complicates the problem.
Second: local characteristics. Strictly speaking, the political, economic and geographic situation differs between areas. An example is the illegal use of local rivers or preserved land.
It is hard to explain or handle all issues by applying one standard from the perspective of the government in Taipei. In addition to the national government being distant from local governments, it deals inflexibly with natural disasters because it has to abide by laws and regulations. Ignoring the local situation may lead to problems with governmental or non-governmental disaster prevention abilities and the distribution of resources. This also leads to the next problem.
Third: the uneven distribution of disaster relief resources. Uneven resource distribution between north and south has long been a problem. This problem also exists in terms of disaster relief resources.
Disaster relief manpower and funds in southern Taiwan are inferior to that in the north. Almost all central government agencies with massive budgets and manpower are located in Taipei. Because the media are more developed in the north, disaster relief issues there receive more attention and resources, further aggravating the problem.
This can hardly be resolved in the short term. Take, for example, the former government’s relocation of the Fisheries Agency to Kaohsiung. On the surface, the agency is located in the south, but in fact, the core powers remain in Taipei.
Fourth: the poor disaster-relief system. Manpower, budget and the environment are all crucial to the system’s functions. But the system is operating poorly, which can be seen in the insufficient training of rescue workers and slow mobilization.
For example, a rubber boat belonging to Tainan County’s Disaster Relief Association overturned during a rescue mission last week. Luckily, in the end, all rescuers were saved.
This highlights the problem, however, of routine training and disaster relief mobilization. To be blunt, the poor disaster relief system is the result of a lack of manpower and money, and it is also related to the local political situation.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) inspected the disaster areas to comfort the victims. This is very important. But what deserves even greater attention is finding a comprehensive solution to systemic flaws.
Yang Yung-nane is a political science professor at the Graduate Institute of Political Science at National Cheng Kung University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
An article published in the Dec. 12, 1949, edition of the Central Daily News (中央日報) bore a headline with the intimidating phrase: “You Cannot Escape.” The article was about the execution of seven “communist spies,” some say on the basis of forced confessions, at the end of the 713 Penghu Incident. Those were different times, born of political paranoia shortly after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) relocated to Taiwan following defeat in China by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The phrase was a warning by the KMT regime to the local populace not to challenge its power or threaten national unity. The
The Iran war has exposed a fundamental vulnerability in the global energy system. The escalating confrontation between Iran, Israel and the US has begun to shake international energy markets, largely because Iran is disrupting shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow waterway carries roughly one-third of the world’s seaborne oil, making it one of the most strategically sensitive energy corridors in the world. Even the possibility of disruption has triggered sharp volatility in global oil prices. The duration and scope of the conflict remain uncertain, with senior US officials offering contradictory signals about how long military operations might continue.
RSS