I used to believe that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators proposed pork barrel bills (“money-pit bills” 錢坑法案) before elections just to attract votes, but that they would change, especially after coming to power.
Now I have to admit that I was wrong.
The legislative elections are long past and the KMT is in power again, but some KMT lawmakers are still pushing for salary increases for key local government officials and dual retirement pensions for workers at state-run companies by categorizing them as civil servants.
Today, Taiwan’s economy is shaken by global inflation and the US subprime mortgage crisis. With all these threats to the economy, people argue whether the middle and lower classes should be given tax cuts or whether the government should go ahead with proposed plans to expand domestic demand.
People argue about these proposals because any such plan requires money. In the face of Taiwan’s financial difficulties, the KMT lawmakers’ proposals can only aggravate the situation.
This shows that the KMT has been incapable of integrating its policy suggestions across party, Cabinet and legislative caucus lines since coming to power. This is certainly related to President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) strategy of taking the back seat to the premier and his attempts to separate party and government.
If the president — who is directly authorized by the public — is stepping back, then the question is: Who has more power? When there’s no clear answer, the result is that everyone does what he thinks is best.
Given that legislators are not acting as part of the government and that the party has problems controlling its legislators, the legislators’ priority is simply to consolidate their own power base and support.
If the party gets involved, its responsibility for winning elections means that it is not clear on whether it should back the government or the lawmakers.
Moreover, the lack of policy integration is a result of not only Ma’s leadership, but also the nation’s chaotic constitutional system.
The predicament caused by the problematic constitutional and party systems in fact began during former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) government and remains unresolved. Over the past eight years, Chen attempted to integrate party and government policy in various ways. But he completely failed because of the restrictions of the constitutional system.
Today, Ma says that obeying the Constitution of the Republic of China is more important than amending it. However, as he continues to insist on obeying a problematic Constitution like this, he will surely face even greater difficulties.
Apart from the constitutional system, another reason behind the KMT lawmakers’ actions may be the nature of the party itself.
Recently, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) requested DPP members to remain rational and not sing the demise of the new government, so that we could overcome all difficulties together. Clearly, she is trying to lay a new path in the confrontation between the ruling and opposition camps.
The problem is that although this new path must be developed in the long term if democracy in Taiwan is to further develop, KMT lawmakers only think of their individual power base and support and do not care about the government’s difficulties. No matter how much goodwill the DPP is sending out, it will be unable to save the KMT.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry