This past week saw not only the Irish rejection of the Lisbon treaty, forcing a crisis summit this week to chart an alternative path to EU continuity, but also the annual EU-US summit in Slovenia, aiming to forge a common trans-Atlantic agenda on Middle East peace, climate change and trade.
The Irish vote is likely to fuel rumors of the EU’s demise, yet it is the latter summit that will prove more revealing about its future. While mending trans-Atlantic divides is commendable, the summit presents an opportunity to rectify misperceptions about the US leading and Europe following on global issues. No matter who occupies the White House, the actual trend is the reverse.
UNASUR
On May 23 in Brasilia, a treaty was signed to establish the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR). It was the most recent example of the real geopolitical revolution that has been under way since the end of World War II: the regionalization of international relations on the precedent set by the six nations who established the Treaty of Rome, which became the European Economic Community in 1957.
It was this breakthrough in thinking that offers the greatest potential to prevent the return of what conservative thinkers take for granted: superpower conflict between the US and China, or an East-West conflict between democracies and autocracies.
From ASEAN to UNASUR and the African Union (AU), it is globalization within regions that has become the driving narrative of political and economic life. The issue is not whether rival trade blocks will emerge, but rather that each regional grouping promises to eliminate conflict among its members, as Europeans have done. The US is no longer providing the security blanket or umbrella; rather, each region is building its own.
For elite observers in Western capitals, it has always been easier to conceive of globalization as global first and local second. Globalization is thought to be synonymous with Westernization.
But in many places today, globalization starts with bringing down barriers between neighbors, building common diplomatic institutions and eventually even common armies, peacekeeping forces and criminal courts — all of which the AU has now established.
A world of regions still needs leadership, but not necessarily a single leader. While many have fretted that Europe follows the US without providing an alternative course, in fact the EU has been providing this model for decades, and it is bearing fruit around the developing world, despite the US’ post-Sept. 11 actions, which have served only to discredit the West.
Today the EU provides more than itself as an institutional model. Its emissions trading system is the world’s leading carbon market and a model that progressive US voices yearn to replicate. It is the largest aid donor and market for goods from developing countries. And next year it will launch an external action service through which eventually the embassies of the EU will be larger abroad than those of individual members.
The EU is not finished. Even if its expansion stops at 30 or 35 members, its global presence will be increasingly felt on matters of global concern.
PAVED THE WAY
Even as multilateral institutions such as the UN, the IMF and the World Bank strive for reform to remain relevant, the EU has paved the way for a world of unions to focus on resolving their own problems and managing globalization as collectives.
One sees this in East Asia’s selective integration of WTO standards, and even in the push for an EU-style North American Union to boost competitiveness. Europe has become the gold standard for creating such institutions, and is far better poised than the US to be the arbiter of disputes among them.
A future concert of powers among the US, China and the EU — capable of setting basic global standards and leveraging the adherence of other major powers such as Russia and India — is a vision with which Americans should be familiar. It resembles Roosevelt’s “Four Policemen.”
A half century later, it is clear who the three most influential global actors are and who must assume responsibility for preserving peace. But among these three, the EU has the most credibility today, and must ensure that the other two do not return the 21st century to the 19th.
Parag Khanna directs the global governance initiative at the New America Foundation. Alpo Rusi is ambassador in the office of the president of the UN General Assembly.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS