The English spelling system is “absolutely, unspeakably awful.” That is the conclusion of new research that has found that children face 800 words by the age of 11 that hinder their reading because of the way they are spelt.
Monkey, asparagus, spinach, caterpillar, dwarf, banana, handkerchief, pliers, soldiers, stomach, petal and telescope have all been included on the long list of words that baffle children because they contain letter combinations that are more commonly pronounced in a different way.
The words have all been identified as problematic for reading, as opposed to writing, because of their “phonic unreliability,” according to the study The Most Costly English Spellings. It was presented on June 7 at the conference of the Spelling Society, held at Coventry University, England. Masha Bell, the literacy researcher who carried out the work, argued that there were 200 words on the list that could be improved by simply dropping “surplus letters” such as the “i” in friend or the “u” in shoulder.
“English has an absolutely, unspeakably awful spelling system,” said Bell, a former English teacher and author of the book Understanding English Spelling. “It is the worst of all the alphabetical languages. It is unique in that there are not just spelling problems but reading problems. They do not exist anywhere else.”
Bell argued that the spelling system was a huge financial burden on schools and was to blame for poor literacy results compared with the rest of Europe. In Finland, where words are more likely to be pronounced as they look, children learn to read fluently within three months, she said. In the UK, academics have found that it takes three years for a child to acquire a basic level of competence. The tricky spellings make English particularly difficult for children with dyslexia and those from disadvantaged families, who are less likely to be read to regularly by their parents.
In the research Bell highlights examples of words that have the same pronunciation but different letter combinations. Examples include “to” and “two”; “clean” and “gene”; “same” and “aim”; “day” and “grey”; “kite” and “light”; and “stole” and “coal.”
Then there are those that look alike but sound different, with the combinations of “ea,” “ee” and the letter “o” causing most trouble. Among the words falling into that category are “eight” and “height”, “break” and “dreamt”, and “move” and “post.” The letters “ough” can also be pronounced in a number of different ways.
Simplifying the system would transform literacy results, Bell said, but people were resistant to change.
“People feel that they have suffered so much at the hands of English spelling that they are reluctant to look at it,” she said.
Yet other countries have made changes. Last month the parliament in Portugal, where the spelling system is also thought to be complicated, voted to reform and simplify it, bringing it into line with Brazil.
“In 1928 the Turks changed their entire alphabet from Arabic to Latin,” said John Wells, professor of phonetics at University College London and president of the Spelling Society. “It happened in the Soviet Union.”
In Germany there were changes made in the 1990s to make the writing system more consistent. English has also developed with words such as “olde” and “worlde” dropping the “e.”
Wells wants to see things change again and feels there are two possible approaches. The first would be to simplify the way in which words are spelt and then allow people to choose whether to use the new or old system, while the second approach would involve a complete change.
“The Spelling Society favors the first,” he said.
Chris Davis, spokesman for the UK’s National Primary Headteachers’ Association, said the spelling system had a major impact on children’s literacy progress: “It definitely slows English children down. In international comparisons, languages that are phonetically uniform always come top.”
But he said that teachers would be reluctant to see things change.
“It would be such a major revolution that people would find it very difficult to contemplate,” he said. “There are already problems because of the different spelling system in America, but there would also be resistance about going down that route. I think it is an ownership thing, that it is our language.”
Davis said people felt that spelling was linked to the origin of words.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS