Fuel prices have increased, and real estate and commodity prices are likely to follow suit. Many now think that developing energy autonomy can reduce import dependence and even resist rising oil prices.
A look at environmental policies in President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) election platform reveals that he proposed to promote energy diversification and raise the consumption of low carbon-emitting energy.
This seems to envision a future in which Taiwan will have a choice of energy resources and in which carbon dioxide emissions will be greatly reduced, turning Taiwan into a low-emissions society. However, there has been no discussion of the costs of achieving this goal.
It is difficult to imagine that Ma intends to increase low-emissions power generation to more than 50 percent of total electricity generation by building additional nuclear power plants. The only choice left is to develop sources of renewable energy.
The previous government set the goal of raising the proportion of renewable energy in the consumption of electricity to 10 percent of capacity by 2010, but actual production might only end up half of that. Official statistics show that we have spent around NT$14 billion (US$460.4 million) thus far on installing wind power generation systems for an annual electricity production of nearly 800 million kilowatt-hours, and reducing emissions by 0.23 percent.
Around NT$600 million has also been spent on solar power generation systems with a capacity of 2 megawatts and an annual electricity production of 2.2 million kilowatt-hours, but this has only reduced carbon dioxide emissions by 6 parts per million. Thus, if we assume that Ma wants to reach the 50 percent target in eight years, the annual investment in power generation will have to be astronomical.
Energy problems involve quantitative and qualitative aspects, and both should be taken into consideration. The former aspect relates to whether supply is sufficient, while the latter covers questions like safety, stability and environmental protection.
Current renewable energy sources such as wind power, solar energy and biofuels perform very well on environmental protection indexes in terms of pollution and carbon dioxide emissions.
The inherent limitations of these energies, however, are their lack of stability and safety.
More importantly, small production volume and regional limitations mean that they cannot be supplied on a large scale.
Another crucial factor for these energies is their high cost, so it may turn out that we will simply be unable to solve Taiwan’s energy problems through renewable energies alone.
Some also argue that if oil prices continue to rise, renewable energy prices will become increasingly competitive.
This may be true, but we must be aware that as gasoline prices surge, the costs of materials and labor for developing renewable energy will also increase.
In addition, as petroleum supplies drop, the supply of silicon crystals necessary for solar power will tighten.
Therefore, with oil prices so high, setting unrealistic goals for developing renewable energies will only add to the pressure on energy prices.
We are faced with the global warming challenge, and it is becoming necessary to develop renewable energies, but that doesn’t mean that we can exclude economic concerns.
We should also have a clear understanding of the characteristics of renewable energy sources and use them appropriately as auxiliary or distributed sources.
For example, it is far more effective to install solar power generation systems in remote mountainous areas with a small and scattered population than to build complicated electricity distribution systems. Wind power generation is preferable to thermal power generation for outlying islands. With all of the organic agricultural waste in the countryside, biogas could be the best source of energy for farming and raising livestock.
The only way to respond to rising energy prices is to conserve energy and improve the efficiency of energy use. Energy-saving architecture might be the best tool we have in this regard.
The government should convene a national conference on energy issues and commence a comprehensive, long-term analysis of potential energy resources.
However, it should not arbitrarily endorse the development of a certain energy source and make large investments that allow a specific industry to profit.
Instead, it should conduct an objective supply-and-demand analysis and explore what different renewable energy sources can contribute in terms of quality and quantity when fully developed.
All this should be carefully assessed, and the government should provide the public with objective and quantifiable data for reference. In so doing, the government should not always trust in academic authority and waste valuable resources for research and development.
Chen Wen-ching is a researcher at the Environment and Development Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Last month, two major diplomatic events unfolded in Southeast Asia that suggested subtle shifts in the region’s strategic landscape. The 46th ASEAN Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf-Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Trilateral Summit in Kuala Lumpur coincided with French President Emmanuel Macron’s high-profile visits to Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore. Together, they highlighted ASEAN’s maturing global posture, deepening regional integration and China’s intensifying efforts to recalibrate its economic diplomacy amid uncertainties posed by the US. The ASEAN summit took place amid rising protectionist policies from the US, notably sweeping tariffs on goods from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, with duties as high as 49 percent.
RSS