By Vaclav Havel, Desmond Tutu, Richard von Weizsacker, Karel Schwarzenberg, Andre Glucksmann, F.W. de Klerk, Mike Moore and Grigory Yavlinsky
The enormous suffering of the Burmese caused by the recent cyclone, which has caused tens of thousands of deaths, deserves the sympathy of the entire world. But more than sympathy is needed, because the Myanmar military junta’s incompetence and brutal oppression are further aggravating the tragic consequences of this natural disaster.
In the midst of the cyclone’s devastation, Myanmar’s ruling generals went ahead and held a referendum on a new constitution. But, according to Myanmar’s Constitutional Referendum Act, members of religious organizations, those subject to criminal prosecution and members of ethnic groups that have not agreed to a ceasefire with the government were barred from voting.
Thus, all current and former political prisoners, about 500,000 Buddhist monks, and more than twice as many members of ethnic minority groups living close to the borders were banned from the vote.
Moreover, according to the new constitution that was supposedly “approved” by the “referendum,” Aung San Suu Kyi, who has never been prosecuted and still remains under house arrest, is barred from standing in the 2010 general elections under the pretext that her deceased husband was British.
Is the world really willing to accept such an absurdity?
We strongly support the opposition’s campaign calling on Myanmar’s citizens to reject the constitution, which does not promote human rights, but only confirms the military’s political role. Many democracy activists have been arrested throughout the country.
The regime’s draconian “law” prohibits participants from criticizing the draft constitution; those who dare to challenge the regime face a 20-year prison sentence.
Given the violent suppression of last September’s mass demonstrations (the “Saffron Revolution”) led by Myanmar’s Buddhist monks and the constant repression in the country, it is not surprising that the military junta tries to shroud its despotic tendencies in pseudo-democratic measures such as the sham electoral process of the referendum.
Sadly, the international community did not respond to last autumn’s mass arrests of human rights defenders.
The 88 Generation leaders, including Min Ko Naing, Ko Ko Gyi, women activists like Su Su Nway, and others bravely expressed their grievances time and again in letters, statements and public demonstrations prior to the Saffron Revolution.
Their courageous calls fell on deaf ears; they now remain imprisoned.
It is time to strongly condemn the exclusion of a considerable number of people from voting and to insist on the release of Myanmar’s political prisoners. The UN and the EU should be ready to conclusively reject the result of the referendum and strengthen sanctions against the regime.
Myanmar’s neighbors in ASEAN should stop looking the other way as Myanmar’s rulers trample on the Burmese.
The UN Security Council should consider introducing a universal arms embargo and the EU should adopt banking sanctions that target the regime and its cronies.
Moreover, the UN should not only condemn, but without further delay put a stop to today’s greatest atrocity: the regime’s obstruction of foreign assistance to victims of the cyclone.
Their deaths are the sole responsibility of the military junta, which deliberately and with knowledge of the likely consequences has closed the door to humanitarian aid and workers from all over the world. Their actions represent an appalling crime against humanity.
The military-run referendum will not bring democracy to Myanmar, nor will it help the Burmese, who now are suffering not only from the authoritarian regime and poverty, but also from a grave natural disaster and its totally inept handling by the cynical generals. Myanmar’s rulers have failed in their duty to protect the Burmese, but active and decisive political action by the international community towards the regime may yet do so.
Vaclav Havel is a former president of the Czech Republic, Desmond Tutu is a winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, Richard von Weizsacker is a former president of Germany, Karel Schwarzenberg is foreign minister of the Czech Republic, Andre Glucksmann is a French philosopher, F.W. de Klerk is a former president of South Africa, Mike Moore is a former director of the WTO and Grigory Yavlinsky is leader of the Yabloko party in Russia.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS