Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Chiang Nai-shin (蔣乃辛) won the legislative by-election in Taipei City’s Da-an District on Saturday, but the party had cause for concern since its victory in the traditional KMT stronghold — which is home to many top KMT members — was far from decisive compared with past polls.
Chiang received 46,065 votes, or 48.91 percent, down from the KMT’s 66.8 percent win in Da-an in last year’s legislative election. Even counting the 9,868 votes for New Party candidate Yao Li-ming (姚立明), the pan-blue camp still won only half the number of votes received by the KMT last year. That should have the KMT worried about the county commissioner and mayoral elections scheduled for December.
Low voter turnout on Saturday and the narrow margin of less than 10,000 ballots between the pan-green and pan-blue camps indicated that voters are dissatisfied with the KMT government’s performance and the controversy over former KMT legislator Diane Lee’s (李慶安) dual citizenship. The outcry surrounding former diplomat Kuo Kuan-ying’s (郭冠英) hate-filled articles may also have played a role.
Two weeks ago, the KMT’s loss in the legislative by-election in Miaoli County served as a warning. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) and several Cabinet ministers turned out to stump for Chiang, and the Taipei City Government was accused of devoting resources to boost his election campaign. The KMT was able to prevent a split in the pan-blue vote, keeping Yao’s votes below 10,000, but 49 percent of the vote was nevertheless an embarrassment compared with the more than 60 percent the party has enjoyed in recent presidential, mayoral and legislative elections.
The Democratic Progressive Party’s Chou Po-ya (周柏雅) took close to 39 percent of the vote, claiming the party’s best-ever result in the Da-an constituency in terms of percentage. In terms of number of votes, however, Chou’s result of 36,465 fell short of the 48,240 votes won by DPP candidate Luo Wen-chia (羅文嘉) in last year’s legislative election. The DPP clearly failed to mobilize its supporters and has no reason to be complacent.
Some in the pan-blue camp saw the by-election as a vote of confidence in the government and felt it would reflect public attitudes toward the corruption case against former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). In fact, allegations of corruption against the former first family have been hitting the DPP at the polls since 2005. Although the DPP lost in Da-an, the start of the Chen trial did not erode its support there. The Chen case may influence the December elections, but it will not decide the outcome.
With the economy in recession and no recovery in sight, the government will struggle to improve its scorecard between now and the end of the year. The DPP, meanwhile, may have passed a low point and be on the verge of recovering support, but it will have to make its case with sound proposals that offer a viable alternative to current government policies.
The year-end polls may still be eight months away, but one thing is clear: Neither the DPP nor the KMT will have an easy ride.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS