Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) yesterday urged President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to stop China’s top negotiator from coming to Taiwan for further negotiations if Beijing does not agree to Taiwan having its own interpretation of “one China.”
Chen’s office issued a statement demanding Ma keep his promise that Taiwan would not engage in any talks with China if Beijing did not agree to Taiwan having its own interpretation of “one China.”
Chen said Ma made the remarks when they met at the Taipei Guest House on April 1 this year.
“I would like to know which Chinese leader over the past five months has said that Taiwan can have its own interpretation of ‘one China,’” Chen said. “The only consensus of the so-called ‘1992 consensus’ is ‘one China’ and there has never been room for a different interpretation of what that means. Why does President Ma want to deceive himself and the people of Taiwan?”
Whether “one China” can be interpreted differently by each side of the Taiwan Strait must be clearly stated, Chen said, and Taiwan’s national sovereignty must not be lost in word games.
Chen said his experience handling cross-strait affairs over the eight years of his presidency had led him to believe that the so-called “1992 consensus” was nothing but a “lie” and a “hoax,” because it was a term created by then Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) in April 2000 after both sides’ top negotiators met in Hong Kong in 1992. Su and then Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) chairman Koo Chen-fu (辜振甫), as well as former SEF secretary-general Shi Hwei-yow (�?�), have since denied the existence of the so-called “1992 consensus,” Chen said.
The so-called “1992 consensus” is a “one China consensus,” Chen said, adding that the official document published by the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) clearly states that “one China” cannot be “interpreted differently.”
If “one China” could be interpreted differently, Chen said, there would be two Chinas, but it cannot, so it is a “one China consensus.”
In other words, to accept the so-called “1992 consensus” is to admit that Taiwan is part of China, a province or a regional government of the People’s Republic of China, Chen said.
The so-called “1992 consensus” is the “unification guidelines” of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), Chen said.
Chen blamed the National Unification Council, National Unification Guidelines and all the related interpretations of “one China” during former president Lee Teng-hui’s (李登輝) term as the source of controversy surrounding the so-called “1992 consensus.”
Since the then KMT government did not reject Su’s “consensus” in 2000, Chen said, the “1992 consensus” became the simplified form of unification guidelines, adding that not until his presidency did the government firmly reject the term and the concept.
Chen said the so-called “1992 consensus” is a contract to sell out the Taiwanese people. To accept it is to accept the “one China” principle and abandon Taiwan’s status as an independent sovereignty, he said.
“Only the 23 million people of Taiwan have the right to decide the future of Taiwan,” he said. “If we forsake Taiwan’s sovereignty, we will become a second Hong Kong or Macau.”
LOUD AND PROUD Taiwan might have taken a drubbing against Australia and Japan, but you might not know it from the enthusiasm and numbers of the fans Taiwan might not be expected to win the World Baseball Classic (WBC) but their fans are making their presence felt in Tokyo, with tens of thousands decked out in the team’s blue, blowing horns and singing songs. Taiwanese fans have packed out the Tokyo Dome for all three of their games so far and even threatened to drown out home team supporters when their team played Japan on Friday. They blew trumpets, chanted for their favorite players and had their own cheerleading squad who dance on a stage during the game. The team struggled to match that exuberance on the field, with
UPDATED TEST: The new rules aim to assess drivers’ awareness of risky behaviors and how they respond under certain circumstances, the Highway Bureau said Driver’s license applicants who fail to yield to pedestrians at intersections or to check blind spots, or omit pointing-and-calling procedures would fail the driving test, the Highway Bureau said yesterday. The change is set to be implemented at the end of the month, and is part of the bureau’s reform of the driving portion of the test, which has been criticized for failing to assess whether drivers can operate vehicles safely. Sedan drivers would be tested regarding yielding to pedestrians and turning their heads to check blind spots, while drivers of large vehicles would be tested on their familiarity with pointing-and-calling
Whether Japan would help defend Taiwan in case of a cross-strait conflict would depend on the US and the extent to which Japan would be allowed to act under the US-Japan Security Treaty, former Japanese minister of defense Satoshi Morimoto said. As China has not given up on the idea of invading Taiwan by force, to what extent Japan could support US military action would hinge on Washington’s intention and its negotiation with Tokyo, Morimoto said in an interview with the Liberty Times (sister paper of the Taipei Times) yesterday. There has to be sufficient mutual recognition of how Japan could provide
A Taiwanese man apologized on Friday after saying in a social media post that he worked with Australia to provide scouting reports on Taiwan’s team, enabling Australia’s victory in this year’s World Baseball Classic (WBC), saying it was a joke and that he did not hold any position with foreign teams or Taiwan’s sports training center. Chen Po-hao (陳柏豪) drew the rage of many Taiwan baseball fans when he posted online on Thursday night, claiming credit for Australia’s 3-0 win over Taiwan in the opening game for Pool C, saying he worked as a physical therapist with the national team and
RSS