China has experienced two successive natural disasters — the ice storms that hit central China earlier this year and the devastating earthquake that ravaged Sichuan Province — even as its people awaited the Beijing Olympics. However, these disasters have not hindered the normalization of relations with China’s neighbors, and the rapid and transparent reporting of the quake was an impressive demonstration of the nation’s self-confidence.
The way the Sichuan disaster has been handled has been in stark contrast to the 1976 Tangshan earthquake. An increasingly confident China could offer a new challenges to cross-strait relations.
First, the response capabilities of Chinese authorities have improved. When the ice storms hit earlier this year, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) visited Hunan and Guangdong provinces to direct disaster relief.
However, the delay in reconnecting the north-south transportation network was frustrating. The power remained out for prolonged periods in many areas and the emergency response and disaster prevention capabilities left much to be desired. However, China’s emergency response since last Monday’s disaster shows obvious improvement.
Second, the government’s ability to manipulate nationalist sentiment cannot be overlooked. Hosting the Olympics is key to Beijing’s efforts to raise its international standing. With less than 100 days to the opening of the Games, the Tibetan unrest and human-rights organizations’ obstruction of the torch relay damaged China’s international image, aroused nationalist anger and even incited boycotts of foreign companies.
But China managed to pacify public resentment and recover its image. This shows that Beijing’s ability to control nationalist sentiment and public opinion should not be underestimated.
Third, China’s strategy of constructing external stability did not change as a result of internal pressure. Instead, China and Japan have recently issued a fourth joint communique that clearly stipulates that they shall pursue peaceful coexistence, and downplays Japan’s historical responsibilities.
This demonstrates that the Chinese government is capable of building a safe environment conducive to a long-term peaceful rise despite nationalist sentiment.
Moreover, with the signing of a free-trade agreement in April, New Zealand became the first developed country to recognize China’s full market economy status. This was a breakthrough for China. A similar agreement with Australia can be expected.
All this indicates that although China has suffered a series of challenges, its capabilities in disaster response have rapidly improved. While under considerable internal pressure, Beijing has still been able to maintain its composure while handling foreign affairs. Taiwan should not underestimate Beijing’s ability to deal with pressure from political variables.
In contrast, on the eve of the transition of power, Taiwan is stuck in a political storm. The Ministry of National Defense hurriedly released a national defense report ahead of the transition, showing the importance the government placed on domestic affairs. Surprisingly, the incoming government has been unable to prevent such shortsighted behavior. On the whole, although Taiwan has not yet shown itself in an awkward plight, its inability to respond to external circumstances is an undeniable.
China suffers from infrastructure shortages and development bottlenecks and has been tested by natural disasters. If these challenges can be overcome, Beijing will be a considerable opponent in cross-strait negotiations. Taiwan should be prepared.
Chen Hsin-chih is an associate political science professor at National Cheng Kung University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath