A perfect storm is brewing that could threaten China’s relations with the world. Although some China bashers in the West and nationalists in China may be rejoicing, the potential deterioration of China’s international relations serves nobody’s interest and threatens to undermine global peace and security.
As the Olympics approach, what Beijing seems to want most — that the Games herald China’s return as a leader among nations — appears close to slipping from its grasp.
If things go wrong, China could move to embrace isolation.
The uprising in Tibet and the government’s response to it have highlighted ethnic tensions within China that the Chinese government is having difficulty managing. Politically unable to accept or sufficiently address the aspirations of the Tibetan protesters, Chinese authorities have focused almost exclusively on the narrow law-and-order issues connected with the violence in March.
For many in the West who sympathize with Tibetans’ aspirations for more meaningful autonomy under Chinese sovereignty, China’s crackdown, vilification of the Dalai Lama and hardline approach have fueled disenchantment. Many Chinese, however, came to view pro-Tibetan protests in Paris, London, San Francisco, New Delhi and elsewhere as an effort to sabotage the Olympics and keep China down after almost two centuries of perceived national humiliation.
China has recently suffered other public-relations disasters as well. The Chinese ship containing arms for the reviled regime of Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe is finally heading home after protests and global condemnation prevented it from delivering its cargo.
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has called for a full arms embargo on Zimbabwe, a position that clearly targeted Beijing.
Moreover, the international community continues to pillory China for its arms sales to Sudan, which is believed to have used the weapons in Darfur.
Moreover, after a seemingly unending litany of stories about tainted Chinese products, a row has now erupted between China and the US regarding contaminated Chinese heparin, a blood thinner. Although Chinese authorities have disputed US claims that Chinese-made heparin led to at least 81 deaths in the US, the scientific evidence has damaged China’s credibility and has strengthened perceptions around the world that Chinese products are unregulated and unsafe.
Finally, growing economic insecurity is creating a backlash against trade and globalization, which could significantly alter attitudes toward China. As Americans and other Westerners increasingly perceive China as a country unable to address its political problems and addicted to growth at all costs, the Chinese government appears to be reverting to a national narrative of victimization that has poisonous roots in China’s perception of historical events such as the Boxer Rebellion from 1899 to 1901.
If the Olympics turn out to be a public relations disaster — because of potential protests by Tibetan, Uighur or Falun Gong activists or supporters, a lockdown in China of foreign journalists, or even doping scandals — there is a real chance that Beijing will blame the West, particularly the US.
Because China’s rise is an irreversible fact, all those who believe that it must become a more “responsible stakeholder” in world affairs cannot wish for its return to nationalist isolation. Just as China needs access to world markets, the world needs China to become a full partner in addressing major global challenges.
Both sides owe each other an open and honest dialogue to help realize this outcome.
Western critics of China have every right to protest any aspect of Chinese behavior and vice versa. Certainly, the US’ actions in Iraq, contributions to global warming and uneven commitment to multilateral problem-solving leave much room for criticism of US behavior.
At the same time, those protesting China’s behavior must remember that China’s rise has brought hundreds of millions of people out of poverty and that China is playing a far more positive role in international relations now than at any other time in its recent history.
China’s leaders must in turn work to prevent the national narrative from returning to one of victimization, even if problems surrounding the Olympics emerge, as they likely will.
China’s recent willingness to reopen a dialogue with envoys of the Dalai Lama and improvement in its relations with Taiwan demonstrate that there is room for creating a more positive environment.
The storm is on the horizon, but there may still be time to prepare to weather it safely.
Jamie Metzl, a member of former US president Bill Clinton’s National Security Council, is executive vice president of the Asia Society.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators have twice blocked President William Lai’s (賴清德) special defense budget bill in the Procedure Committee, preventing it from entering discussion or review. Meanwhile, KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) proposed amendments that would enable lawmakers to use budgets for their assistants at their own discretion — with no requirement for receipts, staff registers, upper or lower headcount limits, or usage restrictions — prompting protest from legislative assistants. After the new legislature convened in February, the KMT joined forces with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and, leveraging their slim majority, introduced bills that undermine the Constitution, disrupt constitutional
RSS