A perfect storm is brewing that could threaten China’s relations with the world. Although some China bashers in the West and nationalists in China may be rejoicing, the potential deterioration of China’s international relations serves nobody’s interest and threatens to undermine global peace and security.
As the Olympics approach, what Beijing seems to want most — that the Games herald China’s return as a leader among nations — appears close to slipping from its grasp.
If things go wrong, China could move to embrace isolation.
The uprising in Tibet and the government’s response to it have highlighted ethnic tensions within China that the Chinese government is having difficulty managing. Politically unable to accept or sufficiently address the aspirations of the Tibetan protesters, Chinese authorities have focused almost exclusively on the narrow law-and-order issues connected with the violence in March.
For many in the West who sympathize with Tibetans’ aspirations for more meaningful autonomy under Chinese sovereignty, China’s crackdown, vilification of the Dalai Lama and hardline approach have fueled disenchantment. Many Chinese, however, came to view pro-Tibetan protests in Paris, London, San Francisco, New Delhi and elsewhere as an effort to sabotage the Olympics and keep China down after almost two centuries of perceived national humiliation.
China has recently suffered other public-relations disasters as well. The Chinese ship containing arms for the reviled regime of Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe is finally heading home after protests and global condemnation prevented it from delivering its cargo.
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has called for a full arms embargo on Zimbabwe, a position that clearly targeted Beijing.
Moreover, the international community continues to pillory China for its arms sales to Sudan, which is believed to have used the weapons in Darfur.
Moreover, after a seemingly unending litany of stories about tainted Chinese products, a row has now erupted between China and the US regarding contaminated Chinese heparin, a blood thinner. Although Chinese authorities have disputed US claims that Chinese-made heparin led to at least 81 deaths in the US, the scientific evidence has damaged China’s credibility and has strengthened perceptions around the world that Chinese products are unregulated and unsafe.
Finally, growing economic insecurity is creating a backlash against trade and globalization, which could significantly alter attitudes toward China. As Americans and other Westerners increasingly perceive China as a country unable to address its political problems and addicted to growth at all costs, the Chinese government appears to be reverting to a national narrative of victimization that has poisonous roots in China’s perception of historical events such as the Boxer Rebellion from 1899 to 1901.
If the Olympics turn out to be a public relations disaster — because of potential protests by Tibetan, Uighur or Falun Gong activists or supporters, a lockdown in China of foreign journalists, or even doping scandals — there is a real chance that Beijing will blame the West, particularly the US.
Because China’s rise is an irreversible fact, all those who believe that it must become a more “responsible stakeholder” in world affairs cannot wish for its return to nationalist isolation. Just as China needs access to world markets, the world needs China to become a full partner in addressing major global challenges.
Both sides owe each other an open and honest dialogue to help realize this outcome.
Western critics of China have every right to protest any aspect of Chinese behavior and vice versa. Certainly, the US’ actions in Iraq, contributions to global warming and uneven commitment to multilateral problem-solving leave much room for criticism of US behavior.
At the same time, those protesting China’s behavior must remember that China’s rise has brought hundreds of millions of people out of poverty and that China is playing a far more positive role in international relations now than at any other time in its recent history.
China’s leaders must in turn work to prevent the national narrative from returning to one of victimization, even if problems surrounding the Olympics emerge, as they likely will.
China’s recent willingness to reopen a dialogue with envoys of the Dalai Lama and improvement in its relations with Taiwan demonstrate that there is room for creating a more positive environment.
The storm is on the horizon, but there may still be time to prepare to weather it safely.
Jamie Metzl, a member of former US president Bill Clinton’s National Security Council, is executive vice president of the Asia Society.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing