Once seen as a promising solution in the battle against global warming, biomass energy is now being blamed for recent food shortages. This illustrates the fact that energy, resources and the environment are closely interrelated and that equal emphasis must be placed on each.
With more farmers growing corn to meet the demand for ethanol for car fuel, there is less corn being grown for either animal feed or to feed humans and the poor people are suffering as a result.
Although grain-converted biomass energy is a type of green energy that can reduce carbon dioxide emissions, its conversion costs are far higher than oil production costs.
Even if the world’s oil supply were completely used up, it is unclear just how much grain could be grown from the limited supply of arable land.
Moreover, if the energy produced turns out to meet only a fraction of the world’s overall needs, we would experience much pain before seeing any benefits.
A recent World Bank report stated that producing biomass energy was a “crime against humanity” as it threatens food supplies and could lead to social instability in some countries.
It is regrettable that the reputation of biomass energy, which was originally trumpeted as natural and environmentally friendly, has been blackened in this way.
However, this is not surprising given that everyone — locally and internationally, from the academic to the corporate world — jumped on the bioethanol bandwagon in their rush toward new technologies to be researched and business opportunities to be exploited.
Back in the 1970s, the idea of biomass energy was not limited to planting crops to produce energy. It was using the anaerobic fermentation of pig manure and all sorts of organic waste to produce methane for burning or power generation.
This method, which both reduced pollution and recycled energy, was more popular than wind and solar power and was seen as the most economically efficient form of reusable energy. The technology was quite mature and its application was commonplace.
Unfortunately, in comparison with ethanol and other kinds of biofuels, it hardly registers now in terms of overall attention or government efforts at promotion and financial support.
Academic and research circles see this as old technology. Nobody appears interested in exploring this field further to fix key application problems. Instead, everyone is attracted to the latest fad.
However, with their effectiveness unproven and their lower economic benefits, the focus seems to be misplaced.
Local sources of organic waste material that can produce methane biomass energy include kitchen waste, pig manure, fruit and vegetable waste, sewer waste and garbage dumps.
My calculations show that potential methane production from such sources would be nearly 500 million cubic meters, which could produce 800 million kilowatt hours.
This would reduce carbon dioxide emissions by approximately 600,000 tonnes, which is no mean feat.
Unfortunately, methane easily disperses and is difficult to collect, and so much of it is wasted and causes serious pollution.
However, if a systematic method of collection could be set up for these waste materials to be collected for energy production, it would not only be far more efficient than allocating valuable land resources for energy crops, but also more humane.
Chen Wen-ching is an environmental technical consultant for the Pingtung County Government.
TRANSLATED BY JAMES CHEN
When 17,000 troops from the US, the Philippines, Australia, Japan, Canada, France and New Zealand spread across the Philippine archipelago for the Balikatan military exercise, running from tomorrow through May 8, the official language would be about interoperability, readiness and regional peace. However, the strategic subtext is becoming harder to ignore: The exercises are increasingly about the military geography around Taiwan. Balikatan has always carried political weight. This year, however, the exercise looks different in ways that matter not only to Manila and Washington, but also to Taipei. What began in 2023 as a shift toward a more serious deterrence posture
Reports about Elon Musk planning his own semiconductor fab have sparked anxiety, with some warning that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) could lose key customers to vertical integration. A closer reading suggests a more measured conclusion: Musk is advancing a strategic vision of in-house chip manufacturing, but remains far from replacing the existing foundry ecosystem. For TSMC, the short-term impact is limited; the medium-term challenge lies in supply diversification and pricing pressure, only in the long term could it evolve into a structural threat. The clearest signal is Musk’s announcement that Tesla and SpaceX plan to develop a fab project dubbed “Terafab”
China’s AI ecosystem has one defining difference from Silicon Valley: It is embrace of open source. While the US’ biggest companies race to build ever more powerful systems and insist only they can control them, Chinese labs have been giving the technology away for free. Open source — making a model available for anyone to use, download and build on — once seemed a niche, nerdy topic that no one besides developers cared about. However, when a new technology is driving trillions of dollars of investments and leading to immense concentrations of power, it offered an antidote. That is part of
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
RSS