Chinese nationalism needs to get hysterical every once in a while. Recently it went off again over issues related to Tibet and the Beijing Olympics. The timing of when it vents is entirely decided by the Chinese Communist Party because in China any parades or assemblies must first receive its approval. The online tirades of the country’s angry youth are also controlled by the party.
The source of the most recent outbreak that has targeted CNN, Grace Wang (王千源) and Carrefour is Tibet. Chinese President Hu Jintao’s (胡錦濤) confidante and Tibetan party secretary Zhang Qingli (張慶黎) insulted the Dalai Lama, the widely respected spiritual leader of Tibet, saying he has the face of a man and the heart of a beast, or calling him a wolf in monk’s robes.
With this hostile attitude, we can conclude that Tibetans will most likely not be willing to submit. However, Beijing did not foresee that its trampling upon the universal values of liberty and human rights would incite such a strong international backlash, especially amongst individuals.
After Beijing expelled all foreign media from Tibet, CNN reported news that had not been fed it from China’s official channels. Consequently, China’s angry youth hurled all manners of insults at CNN. Thinking about just how many of these angry youth are actually able to watch CNN, one can see that this attack on CNN originated from the government. Afterwards, a host on CNN called Chinese officials a bunch of “goons” and “thugs.” The Chinese government insisted that this was an insult to all Chinese and the Foreign Ministry brought the matter up three times. CNN clarified that the remarks were referring to the government and apologized to the “people.”
Of course, with CNN specifying the target as “the government,” Beijing was even less willing to accept their explanation.
Wang is a Chinese student studying at Duke University in the US. During a demonstration attended by Tibetan and pro-China groups, she tried to persuade Chinese students to learn more about Tibet. For this she was castigated as a traitor and viciously attacked.
Angry youth threatened to destroy her and posted private information about her on the Internet. Her parents in Qingdao were harassed and had feces thrown on their doorstep and possessions stolen. Qingdao No. 2 Middle School, Wang’s alma mater, expelled her name from the school’s roll.
The FBI has been investigating this affair.
Because the Olympic torch was extinguished in Paris, some angry youth have claimed that a certain Carrefour board member supported the Dalai Lama and called for a boycott. The person in question denied the accusation, but it was of no use in blocking the tide of Chinese patriotic rage. On April 19, angry youth in six Chinese cities surrounded Carrefour stores. Incidents of property damage and looting were reported at the Hefei branch.
The same day, Chinese students abroad and overseas Chinese took to the streets in some Western cities to demonstrate their patriotism. In the sea of red Chinese flags, one could even see the occasional Republic of China flag!
The Chinese government is walking a tightrope between inflaming nationalistic passions and fearing that they may get out of control. If they do not apply the brakes immediately, these passions will most certainly affect the Olympic Games in August. Therefore, the official media tried to cool things down by urging citizens that “taking good care of your own affairs is the best way to love your country.”
Although they did not report on the blockade of Carrefour so as to keep it from expanding, they did continue to do so in English reports as a threat to Western countries. This is just like the phone conversation between US President George W. Bush and Hu in which the official Chinese media used the “one China” principle while the English version used “one China with each side having its own interpretation.”
This two-faced reporting is the tactic of gangsters that the Chinese government uses to deceive both the Chinese people and the international community.
On April 18, China sent former ambassador to France Zhao Jinjun (趙進軍) to meet French President Nicolas Sarkozy. Following that meeting, France said it would send a special emissary to China. The Chinese media loudly reported the news as France “taking the initiative” to resolve the crisis.
They even stated that the emissary apologized to Chinese torchbearer Jin Jing (金晶) as symbolic of France suing for peace from the “imperial court.” However, because Jin did not support the boycott of Carrefour, she was subsequently excoriated by angry youth as a traitor.
The international community should not show fear in the face of Chinese nationalistic threats, which would only further feed into their sense of superiority. This is the only way to force China to reform.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY JAMES CHEN
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed