When HIV patients in Hebei heard the Chinese premier was visiting, they thought their chance had come. For years they had fought in vain for compensation from hospitals that they allege spread the virus through blood transfusions.
“They knew that Premier Wen [Jiabao (溫家寶)] liked to listen to the ordinary people’s voices, so they wanted to tell him about their problems,” said Jiang Tianyong, a lawyer for their families.
Instead, 11 patients and relatives were detained by police as they sought Wen on his visit to Shahe, in the south of the province. A week and a half later eight are still being held. Police have refused to tell Jiang what charges could be lodged, but described it as a case of “national security.”
The incident says a lot about China’s fight against HIV. After years of inaction and denial, the government has begun to address the problem. High-profile meetings between HIV patients and political leaders are one solution, intended to address the stigma and educate the public about the issue.
Just as significant is the hefty increase in funding for prevention programs and antiretrovirals for patients. There are public information films and the first strategy addressing the needs of men who have sex with men — one of the highest risk groups.
“There’s been a lot of change,” said Wan Yanhai (萬延海), director of the Aizhixing Institute and one of the country’s leading AIDS/HIV activists. “This generation of leaders — [President] Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), Wen Jiabao and [former vice premier] Wu Yi (吳儀) -— have met people with AIDS. They have increased the national budget, opened up to international donors and they tolerate some civil society involvement in provision.”
But when it comes to addressing difficult questions, when activists embarrass officials, or when it comes to implementing policy, the shortcomings of this zeal are clear.
The Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS estimates there were about 700,000 HIV positive people in China at the end of last year. The provinces of Yunnan, Henan, Guangxi, Guangdong and Sichuan and the region of Xinjiang each have more than 10,000 affected residents.
Wan believes that the true figure is far higher and warns that the virus is spreading from high-risk groups such as prostitutes, drug users, migrant workers and the gay community to the wider population. Last year saw around 50,000 new cases. Increasingly liberal attitudes to sex a growing sex trade are adding to the problem.
“There has been a sort of sexual revolution since the market reforms,” said Heather Xiaoquan Zhang, a senior lecturer in Chinese studies at the University of Leeds, England. “People are more open about sex — but in most cases that’s in urban areas among the better educated sections of the population.”
“The Confucian tradition means most people still feel embarrassed to openly talk about sex. Their knowledge of risks and vulnerabilities is quite limited,” he said.
The government has backed landmark programs, which range from educating migrant workers on the use of condoms to commissioning public information films featuring stars such as Jackie Chan (成龍).
Yet, as Wan points out, some subjects remain beyond bounds. UNAIDS estimates that 41 percent of those with HIV in China were infected through heterosexual sex, 38 percent through intravenous drug use, 11 percent through homosexual sex and almost 10 percent through selling or receiving blood and blood products.
The scandal over the blood-driven epidemic that spread through rural China, and particularly Henan Province, was one of the factors which propelled HIV up the political agenda. Peasants who sold their blood for money discovered they had also sacrificed their health as blood-collection services reused dirty needles.
But Wan believes that officials will not admit that transfusion was a problem — as in the Shahe case — because they are reluctant to admit to failings in the system.
“The government has admitted there’s an epidemic among people who sold blood — but not among those who received it. It has not informed the public of the risk from blood transfusions and doesn’t suggest people are tested,” he said.
He warns that the government’s top-down approach also makes it hard to tailor services to different needs, makes it easier for corrupt officials along the way to pocket cash and offers little space for grassroots work.
The organizations which get cash focus on meeting government needs rather than those of the public: building capacity and educating but not engaging in enough direct work.
That leaves the essential work of engaging with high-risk groups to NGOs — when they are allowed to do so. Those working in civil society argue that security preparations for the Olympics have made officials much more suspicious in their dealing with NGOs.
This week the Aizhixing Institute announced an emergency protocol to protect its staff, volunteers, colleagues and clients in the run-up to the Olympic Games.
By way of explanation it offers a tally of recent incidents, including the house arrest or surveillance of more than 100 HIV positive people and activists in the first half of last month. The list begins last December, when Wan himself was briefly detained. It ends with the detention at Shahe.
Officials in Hebei did not respond to my calls about the case.
But Jiang, who maintains that the detentions are illegal, says the Public Security Bureau has told him it needs at least a month to “execute the law.”
“It is their right to want to see the premier,” he said.
“The HIV/AIDS sufferers and their families are innocent victims: They face pain, poverty, and prejudices against them,” he said.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
Yesterday, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), once the dominant political party in Taiwan and the historic bearer of Chinese republicanism, officially crowned Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) as its chairwoman. A former advocate for Taiwanese independence turned Beijing-leaning firebrand, Cheng represents the KMT’s latest metamorphosis — not toward modernity, moderation or vision, but toward denial, distortion and decline. In an interview with Deutsche Welle that has now gone viral, Cheng declared with an unsettling confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin is “not a dictator,” but rather a “democratically elected leader.” She went on to lecture the German journalist that Russia had been “democratized
RSS