Looking beyond the pro-unification media’s depiction of president-elect Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) as a deity sent to rescue Taiwan from pro-independence scoundrels, we can see that Ma is making some effort to reach out to former foes and bridge ideological divides.
On Wednesday Ma met a hospitalized Bo Yang (柏楊) — one of many White Terror victims of Ma’s former employer and idol, Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國). In the 1960s, already on notice for embarrassing the military and other establishment figures in his writings, Bo was imprisoned over a translation of a Popeye cartoon that depicted the spinach-munching sailor and his adopted son Swee’Pea squabbling over who should rule an island that they happened upon.
Bo’s family was torn apart by his imprisonment. But since his release, he has emerged as a champion of human rights and a lacerating critic of Chinese culture. He put aside his short fiction and concentrated on polemical material such as The Ugly Chinaman, as well as translations of classical works into modern Chinese. More recently, Bo has been chairman of Amnesty International in Taiwan.
What made Bo’s case interesting was that he is a Mainlander who fled to Taiwan with most of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) establishment. The sight of Ma grasping the hand of this cultural iconoclast — now in his late 80s — was intriguing. It brought to mind the massive posters that Ma displayed on the outside of the former KMT headquarters a few years back that aimed to rehabilitate prominent victims of KMT rule.
This is Ma’s soft and flexible side. It is a demeanor that has helped him win over ordinary people in the face of hostility from party hardliners who at one time would have had Bo Yang executed.
On Thursday, however, Ma’s harder, more intractable side emerged with the news that the Presidential Office could be moved to Guandu (關渡) on the outskirts of Taipei City because of the current building’s Japanese heritage.
There is no compelling reason why the Presidential Office building deserves to be retained as home base for the head of state. The argument by academic Chen Fang-ming (陳芳明) — music to Ma’s ears — that the building represents a continuing stain on the national consciousness because of its Japanese connection is overstated, however, and not just because the KMT spent an equal amount of time imposing colonial rule on Taiwan from inside its walls.
Ma’s interest in the matter can only be ideological, which means it will be difficult to offer justification for the vast expense that would result from making the move. There are also security considerations: At first glance it is unclear how Guandu might provide a more secure location for a presidential compound if it were to come under Chinese attack.
Ma has yet to be inaugurated, but he has already moved to consolidate the symbolic agenda. For now this process has had few obstacles, particularly because Ma makes a point of displaying a common touch — a lesson learned well from Chiang Ching-kuo — and has won over numerous people who were nominally “deep green” in their political orientation.
But after his election victory honeymoon ends, the conflict between his disgust at Taiwan’s Japanese legacy, for example, and his desire to be all things to all people — including nominal foes and victims of the Greater China mindset — will likely generate concern among his hardline colleagues that he is straying from the KMT’s mission. If Ma then heeds the hardliners after disarming people such as Bo Yang, the goodwill he has cultivated may turn bad very quickly indeed.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this