Seeking a peaceful life and creating economic prosperity are the hope of people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. But these aims cannot be achieved unless the two governments respect each other and negotiate on equal terms. For far too long, Taiwan has in good faith sought to work toward that end; however, these efforts have been marred by China’s political framework and hostility toward Taiwanese. If adherence to quasi-metaphysical principles could be abandoned, negotiations based on respect and equality could be possible.
Last month, Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) purportedly expressed his good faith vis-a-vis Taiwan, but history has shown us that such overtures were nothing more than a continuing attempt to lasso Taiwan and diminish its international space.
At the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Beijing requested that the OECD force out Taiwan through a memorandum of understanding, while at the WHO it successfully barred Taiwan from even participating at the World Health Assembly.
As for military deployment and the Chinese missiles targeting Taiwan, the ambition of unifying “China” has never disappeared.
Given all this, one can be forgiven for doubting the sincerity of the government in Beijing when it talks peace and makes it impossible for the leadership in Taipei to negotiate with an opponent who holds a sword ever at the ready.
The only way out is for China to discard its hostility and dismantle the missiles it aims at Taiwan. Only then will peace and stability be within reach. One thing is certain: People on both sides of the Taiwan Strait are sincerely awaiting the arrival of a diplomatic spring.
Chou Chang-Yu
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath