Yadrung Panaput is an immigrant from Thailand who has lived in Taiwan for 10 years. Out of a pool of more than 300 nominees, she was selected for the National Youth Public Participation Award’s highest honor — the Outstanding Contribution Award — personally presented to her by Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮).
This award was decided unanimously by 18 judges with background in promoting public participation.
In her congratulatory speech, Lu said that Panaput had lit the flame of Taiwanese women’s rights and the award showed was another step forward in the nation’s move to promote the rights of immigrants.
Taiwan’s nearly 400,000 “foreign brides” — including spouses from China — find themselves in a strange position as their presence pricks at Taiwan’s racial consciousness.
On the one hand, the nation’s immigration policy stigmatizes them through a harsh and unreasonable system that ties them down. The difficult and arcane naturalization exam is an example of this. Their bodies are also subject to a high level of monitoring by means of all sorts of regulations — multiple physical exams and mandatory fingerprinting are required for entry and residence application procedures.
What has received the most criticism from international and local immigrant rights groups is the requirement to provide documentation proving assets of NT$410,000 in order to obtain citizenship. Furthermore, Chinese spouses must undergo several interviews.
On the other hand, politicians always love to throw around slogans such as “we are all one family,” “Taiwanese daughters-in-law,” and “mothers of new Taiwanese” as they hold these “new Taiwanese” children in their arms for campaign ads touting their achievements. Apparently, with this second change of political power, new immigrants and their children are still the government’s best props in commercials for “respecting cultural diversity” and “improving human rights.”
Underneath the lofty declarations of the government’s immigration policy still lie real problems that many immigrants face. Many of our sisters from Southeast Asia must still put up with biased rules. For example, they must pass multiple physical examinations to demonstrate the “purity” of their bodies so as not to contaminate the Taiwanese population.
If they have the misfortune of falling victim to domestic violence or face divorce, given the limitations of the law, many of these women have no way to overcome the bias in the legal system toward husbands. In the end they are forcibly separated from their children and return to their home countries with their hearts and spirits completely shattered.
Taiwan appears to possess a healthy amount of resources for looking after members of society, but it falls short when compared with countries such as Japan and Sweden. Moreover, more mutual understanding and education are necessary to eliminate the widespread prejudice and misunderstanding that exists in society toward immigrant women.
We hope that after this change in political power, immigrants would no longer serve as mere propaganda tools for the government to announce to the world its human-rights achievements. We hope that the hard work of these women can be truly recognized and commended.
We hope that society will treat them justly. Compared to politicians who shout “I love Taiwan” at election time, many immigrant women like Yadrung Panaput have demonstrated through their actions and visible contributions to society that their love for Taiwan is genuine and sincere.
Chou Yi-ju is the director of the TransAsia Sisters Association, Taiwan.
Translated by James Chen
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS