Yadrung Panaput is an immigrant from Thailand who has lived in Taiwan for 10 years. Out of a pool of more than 300 nominees, she was selected for the National Youth Public Participation Award’s highest honor — the Outstanding Contribution Award — personally presented to her by Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮).
This award was decided unanimously by 18 judges with background in promoting public participation.
In her congratulatory speech, Lu said that Panaput had lit the flame of Taiwanese women’s rights and the award showed was another step forward in the nation’s move to promote the rights of immigrants.
Taiwan’s nearly 400,000 “foreign brides” — including spouses from China — find themselves in a strange position as their presence pricks at Taiwan’s racial consciousness.
On the one hand, the nation’s immigration policy stigmatizes them through a harsh and unreasonable system that ties them down. The difficult and arcane naturalization exam is an example of this. Their bodies are also subject to a high level of monitoring by means of all sorts of regulations — multiple physical exams and mandatory fingerprinting are required for entry and residence application procedures.
What has received the most criticism from international and local immigrant rights groups is the requirement to provide documentation proving assets of NT$410,000 in order to obtain citizenship. Furthermore, Chinese spouses must undergo several interviews.
On the other hand, politicians always love to throw around slogans such as “we are all one family,” “Taiwanese daughters-in-law,” and “mothers of new Taiwanese” as they hold these “new Taiwanese” children in their arms for campaign ads touting their achievements. Apparently, with this second change of political power, new immigrants and their children are still the government’s best props in commercials for “respecting cultural diversity” and “improving human rights.”
Underneath the lofty declarations of the government’s immigration policy still lie real problems that many immigrants face. Many of our sisters from Southeast Asia must still put up with biased rules. For example, they must pass multiple physical examinations to demonstrate the “purity” of their bodies so as not to contaminate the Taiwanese population.
If they have the misfortune of falling victim to domestic violence or face divorce, given the limitations of the law, many of these women have no way to overcome the bias in the legal system toward husbands. In the end they are forcibly separated from their children and return to their home countries with their hearts and spirits completely shattered.
Taiwan appears to possess a healthy amount of resources for looking after members of society, but it falls short when compared with countries such as Japan and Sweden. Moreover, more mutual understanding and education are necessary to eliminate the widespread prejudice and misunderstanding that exists in society toward immigrant women.
We hope that after this change in political power, immigrants would no longer serve as mere propaganda tools for the government to announce to the world its human-rights achievements. We hope that the hard work of these women can be truly recognized and commended.
We hope that society will treat them justly. Compared to politicians who shout “I love Taiwan” at election time, many immigrant women like Yadrung Panaput have demonstrated through their actions and visible contributions to society that their love for Taiwan is genuine and sincere.
Chou Yi-ju is the director of the TransAsia Sisters Association, Taiwan.
Translated by James Chen
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Workers’ rights groups on July 17 called on the Ministry of Labor to protect migrant fishers, days after CNN reported what it described as a “pattern of abuse” in Taiwan’s distant-water fishing industry. The report detailed the harrowing account of Indonesian migrant fisher Silwanus Tangkotta, who crushed his fingers in a metal door last year while aboard a Taiwanese fishing vessel. The captain reportedly refused to return to port for medical treatment, as they “hadn’t caught enough fish to justify the trip.” Tangkotta lost two fingers, and was fired and denied compensation upon returning to land. Another former migrant fisher, Adrian Dogdodo
RSS