Tue, Apr 01, 2008 - Page 8 News List

EDITORIAL: Beijing performs mass hypnotism

When a trick works, you do it again. Thus Beijing's approach to international media coverage of the Taiwan issue.

The global media's lack of understanding of the complexities involved in the Taiwan Strait, its carelessness with historical facts or, worse, its ideological, commercial and political beliefs, have often led wire agencies and the news organizations that depend on them to take a position that, wittingly or not, benefited China and belittled Taiwan.

The instances of abuse are rife and repetitious, including -- but sadly not limited to -- the contention that Taiwan and China "split in 1949 after a civil war," that Taiwan is a "breakaway province" waiting to be "reunited with the mainland," that it is a "competitor" to China, or that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and the Democratic Progressive Party are nothing but "troublemakers," "splittists," "extremists" or responsible for the "terrible" state of the economy in the past eight years.

Like coverage on other complex issues, the repetition of simplistic stock phrases soon results in them taking over reality, even if the premise is misleading or altogether false. When reductionism gives the illusion that we can make sense of what is otherwise a complex and intellectually demanding subject matter, the tendency is usually to adopt it. The media does that, and so do governments and the masses.

Misleading "facts" have played in Beijing's favor (mostly because it initiated them) and the Chinese leadership has become a master at using the key words the global media is intoxicated with to cast Taiwan as a "troublemaker" that should be blamed for the "tensions" in the Taiwan Strait and for "endangering the peace." So powerful has the grand illusion become that, by accepting the argument that Taiwan threatens (and China seeks) peace, consumers of news have become hypnotized into believing that the 1,400-odd missiles that bristle in Taiwan's direction are irrelevant.

One would think that the election on March 22 of Beijing's favorite, Ma Ying-Jeou (馬英九), would have made Beijing cease its campaign of disinformation. But Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao's (溫家寶) "peace" offer over the weekend shows that this isn't the case. While it was perfectly orchestrated to appear like a sincere and reasonable peace offer to a recalcitrant Taiwan, Wen's remarks were based on, and called for the resumption of, something that anyone who knows anything about Taiwan would know is a lie -- the so-called "1992 consensus." Even the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator who is responsible for the term, Su Chi (蘇起), whose flexibility when it comes to handling factual information is legendary, has openly admitted that the consensus was his fabrication.

But Beijing doesn't care about such little details as the truth. If the "1992 consensus" opens up a new front in its propaganda war against Taiwan and if it allows it to successfully portray itself, through gullible global reporting, as the "responsible" side in the conflict, then so be it. It knows it can count on wire agencies and the news outlets that recycle that information to skirt the complexities of the subject and proliferate that belief until the world is convinced that there is, indeed, such a thing as the "1992 consensus" and that a refusal on Taiwan's part to recognize it would yet again be proof of its "irresponsible" behavior.

This story has been viewed 4620 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top