So your candidates Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) and Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) lost the presidential election by a 17 percent margin. But this is no time for finger pointing, for no single person had enough influence to convince 17 percent of voters not to vote for Ma Ying-jeou (
The independence issue is secondary. Clearly, voters have shown that their main concern was the economy, not the independence issue. You already have a voter base that is pro-independence and wary of Chinese aggression. You know you have their votes. But a troubled economy affects people's abilities to find work and feed families, and if Mr Huang cannot earn a decent living to support himself and his family, then he could not care less about what's happening across the Strait.
If a new college graduate cannot find a job, he is more worried about paying rent than ensuring Taiwanese independence. You may call that near-sightedness, but to the voters it's their reality. You need to protect the interests of the nation in the long term, but address the needs of the citizens in the present. Your need to present sound economic policies rather than simply being known as the party that advocates independence.
And don't neglect female voters. The results in southern, traditionally Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) strongholds were less than impressive. The DPP's wins in the south were marginal, but losses in Chiayi City, Tainan City and Kaohsiung City were of devastating significance. Demographic data from the Central Election Committee shows that in those three cities there were more female than male voters.
For a number of reasons, Ma has always been a favorite of female voters. But the DPP nevertheless failed in its attempt to sway women voters early on in the campaign, and that error was costly.
You should also have sought major endorsements earlier. Just a few days before the election, former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) finally publicly endorsed Hsieh. This was a strong endorsement, but the timing was poor.
Lastly, many overseas voters tend to return to cast their votes. This presents a problem with polling and even campaigning. This situation should not be overlooked and future campaigns should entail attracting these overseas voters. The Internet now makes it possible to reach overseas voters in ways that were unimaginable 10 years ago and the DPP should tap into such technological developments.
Although you lost, you should still be proud of your achievements. You ruled Taiwan for eight years and Taiwanese continue to live in peaceful, democratic harmony. This is in stark contrast with the recent unrest in China and no matter who is elected president, I am sure all Taiwanese wish the same peace and freedom to our Chinese neighbors.
Eugene Liu
Atlanta, Georgia
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath