No sooner had Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Following Ma's comments on Sunday that in order to bring about his promised thaw in cross-strait relations, he would revive the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) to serve as the primary conduit for negotiations, speculation has increased on who will be appointed head, with former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
Lien can certainly stake a strong claim for the position for he was instrumental in forging closer ties between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) when he made his controversial "journey of peace" to China in April 2005 -- a trip that was repeated by Soong a few weeks later.
Still bitter at his presidential election defeat to President Chen Shui-bian (
Lien also played a key part in forging a shady cooperation pact that saw the two parties join forces to oppose their common enemy -- pro-independence forces in the DPP.
It would therefore be understandable if Ma chose someone like Lien or Soong: As part of the KMT's pro-China old guard, they have much more in common with Beijing's ultra-conservative officials.
This would also appear to be a smart move, especially if former president Lee Teng-hui (
Take into account Ma's talk of an Olympic boycott last week, which was followed by an astounding attack on Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
But even so, it is difficult to imagine why Ma would want Lien or Soong to represent his government in talks with China. Lien may have been instrumental in helping the KMT and CCP kiss and make up after decades of war and hostility, and he may have been overjoyed at Ma's election, but he openly opposed Ma when he ran for the party chairmanship in 2005 and the presidency.
Add this to the fact that Ma was an abject failure as KMT chairman, failing either to reform the party, deal transparently with its assets, control the party's legislators or deal with PFP challenges to his authority, and it is hard to see how he could keep either Lien or Soong in check, especially given the KMT party hierarchy, which still allows the aged, pro-China autocrats to wield power.
But if Ma sticks to his pre-election promise not to talk about unification during his term(s), then the sovereignty issue should not be too much of an obstacle because the SEF's mandate will be strictly limited to economic affairs and issues like direct links and cultural exchanges.
In this case, the SEF might be the perfect place for Lien or Soong, as Ma could assign a trusted understudy to keep watch as he puts the old troublemakers out to pasture.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing