Last Wednesday, 100 members of the European Parliament reiterated their support for Taiwan's bid to join the UN. The news was largely overshadowed by election fever in the final days of campaigning, despite the strength of the statement in the European Voice, an independent newspaper that documents EU developments, and the fact that Taiwan was preparing to vote on two referendum proposals concerning UN membership.
The parliamentarians went further than acknowledging the long ignored fact that Beijing's seat at the UN does not represent Taiwan's people and interests. Their statement said Taiwan has never been controlled by the People's Republic of China and that it is a sovereign country.
Taiwan could hardly have asked for more explicit wording. A resounding "yes" to either of Saturday's referendums would have been the perfect complement to that statement. Instead, both proposals failed -- the result of a de facto Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) boycott and an ineffectual government campaign to promote the plebiscites. Although the Democratic Progressive Party and KMT plebiscites both received overwhelmingly positive responses -- as expected -- only 35 percent of voters cast ballots in the two polls.
Those disgraceful figures are a fact fated to be manipulated by Beijing for years. Equally tragic, they are likely to be misconstrued by the rest of the international community.
The statement by EU lawmakers reflected the principles that the countries they represent so often tout -- equal representation, an integral aspect of democracy and human rights. The governments of those same countries, meanwhile, remain silent on the issue of Taiwan, or else toe Beijing's line.
Taiwan cannot afford to echo that silence. The nation has missed a chance to make itself heard and now must focus on minimizing the damage. It must not leave this heartening statement by EU parliamentarians unanswered. As president-elect Ma Ying-jeou (
The cards are stacked in Ma's favor. He will have an absolute majority in the legislature ready to back any Cabinet proposal. And in light of statements he and his party made in the months leading to the election, failing to take action could only be interpreted as duplicitous.
Topping the agenda for Ma becoming president should be a Cabinet proposal for a legislative resolution underscoring what EU parliamentarians so eloquently proclaimed last week: Taiwan is not the People's Republic of China. As such, it is denied representation at the UN but should continue to seek to break out of its international isolation.
These are statements that are not controversial in Taiwan and the legislature should pass them unanimously. The issue of the nation's ideal title at the UN is not vital to a legislative proposal. Unnecessary controversy should be avoided in favor of garnering a unanimous vote that would amplify the resolution's significance in light of the legislature's fierce divide.
In the weeks leading to the election, Ma promised to protect this nation's sovereignty in the face of Beijing's oppression. And in September, at a rally in Taichung, Ma said the KMT would fight for an end to the nation's isolation.
Come May, he will be perfectly positioned to make those aspirations heard again. Proposing a resolution would demonstrate his sincerity and offer a clear signal that he will not tiptoe around the issue of national sovereignty to avoid riling Beijing.
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) has said that the armed forces must reach a high level of combat readiness by 2027. That date was not simply picked out of a hat. It has been bandied around since 2021, and was mentioned most recently by US Senator John Cornyn during a question to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday. It first surfaced during a hearing in the US in 2021, when then-US Navy admiral Philip Davidson, who was head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said: “The threat [of military
RSS